The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Jim Gomez → The Ren & Stimpy Show  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, this guy was one of the directors and writers working on the show, but he's done a lot more than that as IMDb can attest (e.g., Tom and Jerry Tales, Poochini's Yard, The Magician, Oggy and the Cockroaches, The Transformers: The Movie), so it doesn't make sense to redirect him to this article. I'm not sure about creating an article either, since he doesn't seem to be notable and Wikipedia search results bring up other unrelated Jim Gomezes as well as him. Regards, SONIC678 00:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete to encourage article creation and facilitate uninhibited Search (which will find 27 mentions). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:04, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Sonic678 and Shhhnotsoloud. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 22:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 20:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Maxime Blasco → Operation Barkhane#French forces 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, an internet search shows that this is the name of a French soldier killed in this conflict, but unless it's DUE for inclusion at the target, there's no use for the redirect. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Enwiki hasx nothing about the subject. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Page was created as Blasco was mentioned in Recent Deaths. –DMartin 03:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Winston (talk) 02:15, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was No consensus, default to delete. There is a consensus that current target is not appropriate, but no agreement on what if any alternative target would be better. Thryduulf (talk) 20:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Celtic Orthodox Church in the United States → Christianity in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The subject is not mentioned in the article to which this redirect leads to. Therefore, I propose the deletion of this redirect. Veverve (talk) 13:35, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with Veverve. This redirection is tantamount to deleting the articles on every other Christian denomination in the USA and redirecting to the generic article. Why has that not been done? Why has this specific group been targeted? Dogface (talk) 15:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget, weakly to Ancient British Church in North America. According to Celtic Orthodox Church, "Ancient British Church" is an alternate or archaic name for the same orthodoxy. However, there is no information in that article specifically pertaining to the United States. Ivanvector's squirrel (^trees/_nuts) 16:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Ivanvector: The Church called "Ancient British Church" is a completely different church from the church called "Ancient British Church in North America", so a redirect there does not make sense. Veverve (talk) 04:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• @PEIsquirrel: also, the article does not say that anymore. Veverve (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• From what I see in Celtic Orthodox Church, it was united with two other churches in 2007 to form Communion of Western Orthodox Churches which mentions that it has presence in United States among other countries (but this communion is not mentioned in the current target). So retargetting there, I believe the reader will get context of the subject, though not specific information. Jay (talk) 16:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Jay: No, it did not unite. It formed an organisation with other churches which is called "Communion of Western Orthodox Churches" so that each of those churches have a common medium where to cooperate and dialogue; such an organisation is similar to the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops of the United States of America. The "Communion of Western Orthodox Churches" is not a merge, all those churches which are part of it are still independent. Veverve (talk) 04:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • So, wrong choice of the word unite in the Celtic Orthodox Church page. I have struck off my vote. Jay (talk) 05:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there is no clear information for a possible retarget. Jay (talk) 16:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Bean (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) feminist (+) 09:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• BEANS → Bean  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely capitalization, we don't have all-caps plural redirects for most words and I don't see why Bean would be an exception. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• REtarget to Bean (disambiguation), and leave it as an improper capitalization. -- 64.229.90.53 (talk) 03:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and mark as a {{R avoided double redirect}}. Beans redirects to Bean as primary topic, and there is nothing on the disambiguation page that would be more plausible as a target for an all-capitalised plural (the only all-caps page is BEAN (charity)). Redirects like this aren't strictly necessary, but equally they are completely harmless where they exist and this one gets around a 100 hits a year so deletion really wouldn't bring any benefits to the encyclopaedia while making it harder for people to find the content they are looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 08:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Bean (disambiguation), similar to BIRD, WHIP, GREEN, COWS, etc. which do not point to the normally-capitalised base titles. Judging from Google Image search, both Beans (2020 film) and Beans (band) were stylised using all caps. Correct spellings should take precedence over misspellings. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 06:15, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Bean (disambiguation). This one's difficult since Bean is obviously the most popular "bean(s)" article, but since this redirect is both all-caps and plural, gonna have to go with the disambiguation. Winston (talk) 02:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.