The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Alabamian rivers → Rivers of Alabama  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I made this with the intent of "correcting" RfD Alabaman rivers before realizing that neither of these unused redirects is needed or useful. There are no analogous redirects for neighboring states. Phrasing is unnatural. (I also targeted incorrectly: Rivers of Alabama rather than directly to List of rivers of Alabama) -- ℜob C. alias ALAROB 23:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you created it, instead of tagging it for RfD, tag it for G7 speedy deletion. Thank you! JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 12:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Note this was a Neelix creation. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Alabaman rivers → List of rivers of Alabama  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Similar to the RfD Alabaman people, this unused redirect has no counterparts for neighboring states, and the correct demonym is "Alabamian" (with an "i"). ℜob C. alias ALAROB 23:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. For what it's worth, the infobox at Alabama cites both "Alabamian" and "Alabaman" as correct. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Alabaman people → Alabama  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Nothing links to this redirect page; it's very unlikely that anything will. Neighboring U.S. states do not have comparable redirects (although Georgian people redirects to an article related to the Republic of Georgia). Lastly, it's a frequent mistake, but the correct demonym is "Alabamian" rather than "Alabaman." ℜob C. alias ALAROB 23:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Couldn't this be a misspelling for the Alabama people? Or alternatively (and less plausibly?) for the population of the state described at Demographics of Alabama, or for People of Alabama (which redirects to a list of individuals)? – Uanfala (talk) 01:16, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Haas Building (disambigution) → Haas Building (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Implausible typo in "disambiguation". There are no similar ones like "Disambiguation (disambigution)" in enwiki. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 13:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. Avilich (talk) 19:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support what? Do you mean, "keep", "delete'", or something else? Seventyfiveyears (talk) 21:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom means whatever you, the nominator, wants. In this case, delete, presumably. Avilich (talk) 22:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the verification. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 00:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this error in disambiguating (WP:COSTLY). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unnecessary clutter. If linked, User:DPL bot will report a WP:INTDAB error. Narky Blert (talk) 08:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Yoda. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) free Hong Kong 14:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Do or do not, there is no try → The Empire Strikes Back#Legacy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Target not mentioned in article. I know this comes from Yoda but it may be better to send people to wikisource than to send people to an article that does not mention anything about this famous Yoda quote. Aasim (talk) 09:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Yoda, as the quote is commonly associated with that character. Dominicmgm (talk) 18:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Yoda. As a sidenote, it's worth mentioning that this redirect has over 5,000 recorded pageviews.―NK1406 ^{talk•contribs} 03:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If redirected some info regarding the line needs to be added since currently the proposed target doesn’t mention the line.--65.92.160.124 (talk) 03:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.