The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F2 by KrakatoaKatie (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:SURABHI PRABHU.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks like a professional-produced photo, and I'm not seeing any convincing proof that the uploader took the photo or owns its copyright. Steel1943 (talk) 00:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - Previous upload was deleted as F9 and editor was blocked for copyright violations. Eeekster (talk) 00:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mapa-rodovia-faria-lima.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The Brazilian government does not release its works free of copyright. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 05:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seesmic Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly not free. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I have changed this to a fair use logo. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Srplogo33.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo of a political party. The uploader is unlikely the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fritts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says "Photo by Michael Cornelison, Alabama Living". Who is Michael Cornelison? Stefan2 (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:B4x-YpHIYAAFt6n.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Website screenshot. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:La course presidentielle de 1990 - Stevenson Magloire.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Overwritten file: two in one.

1. File uploaded by Alsandro (talk · contribs) and Pennsylvania Penguin (talk · contribs): Appears to be a painting by Stevenson Magloire. There is no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder.
2. File uploaded by Pennsylvania Penguin (talk · contribs): Dupe of File:Vincestevensonfootball.jpg. To be speedily deleted per WP:F1. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• The painting is certainly here without permission. And the dupe has no need for retention. Perhaps a fair use claim could be made for the painting, but there is no specific commentary on the painting used in Stevenson Magloire. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tripp Eisen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Overwritten file: three in one.

1. File uploaded by Iamyourpast (talk · contribs): Sourced to an external website. No evidence of permission.
2. File uploaded by KoRnDoll (talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Uploaded several years later in a slightly different form under the same name on Commons by a different user who claims that it is own work by the Commons uploader. Unfortunately, we have no evidence that this is the case.
3. File uploaded by Aiwy (talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Stefan2 (talk) 21:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:SilverFast PrinTao.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a software screenshot, and so would need an OTRS confirmation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pavilion View.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Does the text "copyright reserved of ugyen dorji" mean that the picture is unfree? Stefan2 (talk) 23:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• It suggests that the uploader is not the copyright owner. It raises a question as to whether this can be released to the public domain or not by uploader. But this person looks to be inactive here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:30, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:School1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Overwritten file: three in one.

1. File uploaded by Hzoi (talk · contribs): Claimed to be a work of the United States Government with a link to a United States Government website. The link doesn't seem to work for me. If it can be verified that the file is a work of the United States Government, then the file can be kept, otherwise delete.
2. File uploaded by Yeshy (talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Delete.
3. File uploaded twice by Eng2hgroup (talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Delete. Stefan2 (talk) 23:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the file I uploaded: while the Army has changed the website and no longer displays that photo, you can see a photo taken from another vantage point on the current JAG School website, [1]. As an Army employee who witnessed the photo on an Army website, I can vouch that the photo was Army work product, but if it is deleted, I will not lose sleep at night. Hzoi (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, since the JAG School article doesn't even link to this photo anymore, it can safely be deleted. Hzoi (talk) 21:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.