Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 April 28
April 28
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Armor radar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The image seems to come from http://nsstc.uah.edu/ARMOR/ which have a copyright 2004 at the bottom of the page. I don't know if it could be used as a logo to circumvent this fact.Pierre cb (talk) 01:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I uploaded the picture 6 years ago and don't really know. Delete it if you feel like it should be. It's all good. Nhlarry (talk) 20:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete, unclear as to who owns the copyright of the image. — ξxplicit 22:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PDOD-Capt UNTSO.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source listed does not correspond with the picture being the uploader's own work. —Darkwind (talk) 02:08, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I can confirm that this photo was taken by me from a photo owned by the late Patrick Denis O'Donnell, and under license from his heirs to use in the global commons and for the wikipedia article on him. Seneschally (talk) 22:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Even if Patrick Denis O'Donnell owned a photo it is not sure that he was the copyright holder. The photographer has the copyright unless it is transferred to the Patrick Denis O'Donnell. If it was taken by a family member the copyright is probably not a problem. But if it was taken by a professionel photographer... --MGA73 (talk) 18:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I can confirm that this photo was taken by me from a photo owned by the late Patrick Denis O'Donnell, and under license from his heirs to use in the global commons and for the wikipedia article on him. Seneschally (talk) 22:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Catarman Seal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- City, Municipalities seal/logo are not free use Mlpearc (powwow) 03:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fume-shroom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a screen capture. Eeekster (talk) 04:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ismail Haron Recent.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Link is for promotional images. Appears to be someone else's work, not the uploader's. We hope (talk) 04:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Waldemar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is claimed to be a photo taken less than 100 years ago by someone who died at least 100 years ago. No photographer or year of first publication given, so this might be copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 20:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Workhouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says that the author died at least 70 years ago, but the author isn't named. Furthermore, this gives no information about the copyright in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Corfu Ghetto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Corfu Ghetto.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 20:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Grosvenor crestlogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image is a crest (logo) of a club that dates back to 1869. It is fairly clear that it can't be the uploader's own work, and there's no other source given. Not sure if this would be PD now as the club is still in existence. —Darkwind (talk) 22:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NormanLacyLindsayThompsonW200.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The caption in the article states this image is from 1976. It does not appear to be the work of the uploader. —Darkwind (talk) 23:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.