Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 September 21
September 21
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sainik Samachar coffee table book.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- book cover, no source, doubtful uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:52, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Femalenudeprint.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged with {{self}}, but the summary says "fair use". This is apparently an artwork made by Christopher Easton. There is no evidence that the artist has released this work under a free license. —Bkell (talk) 16:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Animalcrackers lg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photograph of a product box, doubt the said product is licensed under cc-by. Probably an unauthorized derivative work. Acather96 (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So, as with every damn time I've uploaded a photo, it sits around for years not bothering anyone and then one day someone takes up an issue with it. Furthermore, there's nothing in plain English that says what I can do about it! So what do you people want me to slap on this file that will tell you that it's just a picture of some damn crackers? Dismas|(talk) 18:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Too simple to be copyrighted by the package manufacturer. I think we can call it De minimis --Sreejith K (talk) 13:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I strongly contest that this meets the De minimis rule, it contains multiple instances of presumably copyrighted art, and more importantly, is the main and only subject. De minimis applies when, for example, I took a screenshot of a freely licensed software, and the Microsoft toolbar was pictured at the bottom. In reply to Dismas, you need to apply a fair use rationale and appropriate non-free file copyright licensing tag, after making sure the file does meet the non-free content criteria. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 16:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So the day that I'm finally told how I can fix it, the file gets deleted. Great. Thanks a lot. Dismas|(talk) 05:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I strongly contest that this meets the De minimis rule, it contains multiple instances of presumably copyrighted art, and more importantly, is the main and only subject. De minimis applies when, for example, I took a screenshot of a freely licensed software, and the Microsoft toolbar was pictured at the bottom. In reply to Dismas, you need to apply a fair use rationale and appropriate non-free file copyright licensing tag, after making sure the file does meet the non-free content criteria. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 16:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Taban-bontas-utan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Possibly only for non-commercial use, see file summary Acather96 (talk) 16:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Krisztinater-Zograf és Zinsler 1872 elott.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Possibly only for non-commercial use, see file summary. Acather96 (talk) 16:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Krisztinater-1883-utan-ismeretlen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to only allow non-commercial use, see file summary. Acather96 (talk) 17:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Negresco-ft.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be for non-commercial use only, see file summary, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 17:41, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pathway 800.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Only licensed for non-commercial use Acather96 (talk) 17:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AcornSchoolTree.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Licensed for non-commercial use only. Acather96 (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bichet right.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Licensed for non-commercial use only. Acather96 (talk) 17:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tortolapanoramajost.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Licensed for non-commercial use only. Acather96 (talk) 17:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bloodpython.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Only licensed for non-commercial purposes. Acather96 (talk) 17:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Redsavinalogo1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Only licensed for non-commercial use, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 18:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gliderdomain.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Possibly only licensed for non-commercial use Acather96 (talk) 18:12, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Missourifront.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Only licensed for non-commecial purposes Acather96 (talk) 18:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Huastecapic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Only licensed for non-commercial use Acather96 (talk) 18:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Glider domains.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Possibly only licensed for non-commercial use Acather96 (talk) 18:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ontario-cottage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Only licensed for non-commercial/non-derivative uses Acather96 (talk) 18:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pwneds.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image stated from a movie, but looks like a video game. Either way it's claimed PD-self and almost certainly not, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 18:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:McMahon-DVD-owned.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo of a DVD, claimed PD-self, unauthorized derivative work, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 18:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bar60.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged as a self-created image. However, the photograph is dated 1960 (seen the top of the image), and the uploader says on his user page that he was born in 1950. It seems unlikely that a ten-year-old child would be the photographer for what appears to be an official photograph of the members of the Bar Association of Churu, so I doubt that this is really the uploader's own work. —Bkell (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bar55.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See previous listing. This is tagged as a self-created image, but that seems even less likely than the previous one. According to the Mohar Singh Rathore article, this photo shows "Mohar Singh Rathore as a leading Advocate in 1955". According to the uploader's user page, the uploader would have been five years old in 1955. Very unlikely that the uploader is the creator. —Bkell (talk) 21:12, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Msr 111.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Memorial at Churu.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Moharsinghji.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:MOHAR11.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Msr 1977.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Balram3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Sevadal25Dec76.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:MP elec.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Msr Sukhadiaji 18Aug1970.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Msr1962.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs). — in 1962, uploader was 12 years old
- File:ASCUR21.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Lakhau.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:ASCUR25.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Msr sketch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Cur group dlo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See the previous two listings. The uploader, User:Jaisingh rathore, claims to be the creator of these images. However, based on his unlikely claims of authorship for File:Bar60.jpg and File:Bar55.jpg, the lack of any evidence for his claim of authorship for these images, and the fact that these images happen to illustrate many important events in the life of Mohar Singh Rathore spanning several decades, I am skeptical that the uploader is the creator of them all. —Bkell (talk) 21:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- On the other hand, I just noticed that the uploader and the subject appear to have the same last name, so perhaps the uploader is a relative of Mohar Singh Rathore? If this is the case, the relationship needs to be clarified—the "self-created" tag is inaccurate. —Bkell (talk) 21:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:QueenElizabethAnkara2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historic photograph from Turkey from 1961. Bogus tagging with {{PD-TR-Gov}}; no reason given why this should apply. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete: This photograph, in this book published by the General Directorate of the Press and Information, copyright should belong to the Photojournalists' Association (Foto Muhabirleri Derneği). Takabeg (talk) 07:41, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Turkish Air Force pilots in 1942.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historic photograph from Turkey, from 1942. Might become PD-old-70 next year (if it was an anonymous work), but no reason to think it falls under {{PD-TR-Gov}}, which is a thoroughly bogus tag anyway (see TFD on that template.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The copyright will expire next year. Takabeg (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WithShahRezaPahlavi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historic photograph tagged with the bogus tag {{PD-TR-Gov}}, obviously in the mistaken belief that Turkish government works are PD in the same way as US government works. They are not, and the scope of PD-TR-Gov is entirely different (if it has any legitimate scope at all, which I doubt, see TFD.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Source is tthis book published by the General Directorate of the Press and Information. The copyright should belong to the Photojournalists' Association (Foto Muhabirleri Derneği). Takabeg (talk) 07:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Inonu Churchill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historic photograph from Turkey, same situation as above. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The copyright will expire in 2013. Takabeg (talk) 07:50, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Churchill Inonu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historic photograph from Turkey, same situation as above. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The copyright will expire in 2013. Takabeg (talk) 07:50, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ArmyCommander.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historic photograph from Turkey. Same situation as above. Also has a PD-self tag, which is apparently bogus and contradicts other statements above. Also has something that looks like an intended non-free usage FUR. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The source is this book published by the General Directorate of the Press and Information. The copyright should belong to the Photojournalists' Association (Foto Muhabirleri Derneği). Takabeg (talk) 07:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Huyton Hill Preparatory School - aerial.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is an aerial photograph of a school. The uploader says it was "published freely in 1950 by Huyton Hill School, UK." Earlier the uploader had provided the following information:
- Scanned by Matthew Johnson, used with permission and extracted from:
- http://www.friendsreunited.com/album.page/album?albumKey=378471&albumType=schoolalbum&member_key=0&mediaKey=0&commentPage=0
- From Friends Reunited Terms and Conditions:
- "4. Intellectual Property Rights
- 4.1 We do not claim ownership rights in the content, information, pictures, images, sounds, videos, graphics, software, files, or any item whatsoever that you or any other Member posts on the Site or otherwise makes available or accessible to other Members or users of the Site and Friends Reunited Service ("Content"). If you post Content in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, you will retain all intellectual property rights in that Content subject to the licence granted by you to us pursuant to clause 4.2 below;"
- The image is currently tagged with {{PD-US-1996}}. However, in order for this tag to apply, we need evidence that (among other things) this image was in the public domain in its home country on the URAA date (January 1, 1996 for most countries), and we have no such evidence. —Bkell (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The uploader writes on his talk page, "The picture was scanned from a 1950 postcard that was given free by the school to parents. The school closed in 1969 and the headmaster died in 1971. The postcard used for the scan was destroyed in a house fire and I do not know of any other original. GordonD (talk) 09:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)" —Bkell (talk) 04:05, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Victoria Larrière.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This appears to be taken directly from the french webpage of Victoria Larriere. I doubt it's in the public domain. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:59, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This file was given to me by Vitoria Larrière's mother and she said it was free to use. I'll see with her to clarify the status of this photo, and update the license information at the source. Zebulon84 (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.