These peer review volunteers have signed up to give feedback.
How to use
Choose some editors in your subject area and contact them in a nice and persuasive way to increase your chances. Taking a moment to thank them for their help is usually appreciated. Asking for a review at an associated Wikiproject, some which are listed below, can also be useful. General copy editors are listed at the bottom.
How to add yourself to the list
Feel free to add yourself to the list! Place yourself in the category or categories you'd like to do peer reviews for. Volunteers can add the userbox {{Peer review volunteer}} to their user page.
In the future, there might be the ability to receive automatic messages on your talk page about pending reviews. To do this, add "(contact monthly)" to your entry.
This list is intended to be helpful for editors seeking volunteers to review. For this reason, a bot regularly removes inactive editors off the list (please don't be offended if your name is taken off!). When you become active again, feel free to add your name to the list again.
Lastly, please don't change the categories, which reflect the general categories used in peer review.
Chetvorno (talk· contribs) - Horology, electrical engineering, other branches of engineering.
Jojalozzo (talk· contribs) - Computer science. Always looking for the shortest path between two points.
Rublov (talk· contribs) - Computer science and software engineering.
Actualcpscm (talk· contribs) - Digital camera technology, technical image analysis
Arts
Art history
Editors
Ceoil (talk· contribs) - Pre-raphaelite, romantic, and early modernist art, music, and poetry. School of London. And anything at all to do with music since 1976.
Czar (talk· contribs) - Contemporary and modern art (20th/21st century), avant-garde music and film, indie video games
Johnbod (talk· contribs) - Visual arts worldwide to 1800 or later, and decorative or applied arts
Wingedserif (talk· contribs) - Italian medieval and Renaissance art, painting materials, calligraphy
Xoak (talk· contribs) - Nordic and Western European art, paintings, historical women associated with art, films
Music and film
Editors
DivaKnockouts (talk· contribs) - Anything music, preferred Latin music.
Magiciandude (talk· contribs) - Latin music, and possibly any pop culture related to Latin America.
Mark Miller (talk· contribs) - Theatrical arts, fine arts, photography, history, technique. mediums, visual arts, museums etc.
Casliber (talk· contribs) - Sport, particularly football, and food and drink. Can help with pop culture stuff, film (access to lots of cookbooks and filmbooks), RPGs/boardgames (a bit)
Ahendra (talk· contribs) – Majority on Islamic history mainly caliphate era, could help too in limited Chinese history particularly Three Kingdoms era.
Buidhe (talk· contribs) – Irish/Scottish/American history, WWII in Europe, aviation history (contact monthly)
Caeciliusinhorto (talk· contribs) – Classical and Archaic Greece, history of gender and sexuality, especially the intersection between the two. Also interested in ancient history and social history more generally, though without as much specialist knowledge.
Carcharoth (talk· contribs) – General interest on obscure topics and anything involving science, medicine and technology, or exploration and discovery. Also happy to peer over the shoulders of the genuine history editors and make appreciative noises.
Ceoil (talk· contribs) – Early medieval; Henry II, Eleanor of Aquitaine, King John.
Jr8825 (talk· contribs) – Most familiar with British, European and Southeast Asian history from the medieval period or later, although I'm happy to take a look at subjects outside of these areas. (contact monthly)
Kavyansh.Singh (talk· contribs) – Anything related to American politics, particularly presidential campaigns, and late American/world history.
Nikkimaria (talk· contribs) – Especially Canadian and American, but could probably help with British or modern history if needed
Nikkimaria (talk· contribs) – History, especially Canadian history
Pelarmian (talk· contribs) – 19th and 20th century Europe, mainly western Europe.
Peter Isotalo (talk· contribs) – Mostly medieval and early modern history. I also have ready access to sources on Soviet history.
Rublov (talk· contribs) – 20th century, especially post-war American history.
Serial Number 54129 (talk· contribs) – Early/late medieval–early modern British history, particularly political, but no major constraints (contact monthly)
Carcharoth (talk· contribs) - Available for minor copyediting improvements, but not guaranteed to spot everything.
HJ Mitchell (talk· contribs) - General copyediting, particularly for prose and MoS compliance. I prefer biographies, but I'll take on just about anything.
Iztwoz (talk· contribs) - General copyeding. Preferences are for life sciences and philosophy but can be interested in most things bar pop culture.
Jojalozzo (talk· contribs) - American English. Always looking for the shortest path between two points. Technical topics welcome.
Jr8825 (talk· contribs) - Proof reading, grammar and reference formatting. Native speaker of British English. (contact monthly)
Learnerktm (talk· contribs) - Learning about copyediting, grammar and all. :)
Miniapolis (talk· contribs) - Most familiar with American English, and willing to work with other varieties. Particular interests are history, science and linguistics, but I'm happy to help with anything (even pop culture :-)).
Nikkimaria (talk· contribs) - General, but I know Canadian English and I can only sort of speak American.
Scribolt (talk· contribs) - Available for general copy editing on almost any subject, and re-structuring of content. I'm much more concerned with flow & clarity than grammatical minutiae. Disclaimer: I do not pretend to be an expert on FA/GA standards, but if you want a outside view on what your prose looks like I'm happy to help.
Ukexpat (talk· contribs) - British English grammar, syntax, punctuation and spelling. One time classical scholar so a stickler for that kind of thing.
Wingedserif (talk· contribs) - Copyediting in US or British English
All types of article can be peer reviewed. Sometimes, a nominator wants a peer review before making a featured article nomination. These reviews often wait longer than others, because the type of review they need is more detailed and specialised than normal. There are some things you should know before doing this:
Have a look at advice provided at featured articles, and contact some active reviewers there to contribute to your review
Please add your article to the sidebar Template:FAC peer review sidebar, and remove when you think you have received enough feedback
Updates
In the future, you will be able to add your name to a list that will automatically contact you for reviews in your topic area every month. To do this, add "(contact monthly)" after your entry on the list.
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung
