Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Zombie page
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. —ScottyWong— 19:56, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Zombie page (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Not a very useful essay, the only substantial contributor was Robert McClenon. Should be in userspace if he will be the only contributor. FAdesdae378 02:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Poetify : The text has definite literary quality, but it really should be poetified to reward its readers. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:17, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Userfy Quite an amusing essay, much like the ones User:Cimon Avaro wrote, but one that would make more sense in userspace than in projectspace. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:B15A:4ECC:3C0E:728A (talk) 19:37, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - The reason I wrote this was to be able to link to it in deletion discussions, to say: *Delete with silver bullets. This is a Zombie page." Robert McClenon (talk) 02:07, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Should this page be tagged for humor? 2601:647:5800:1A1F:9136:E404:D0E8:A715 (talk) 19:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Probably Dronebogus (talk) 07:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Question for Robert, do silver bullets work with zombies? The silver bullet page mentions werewolves and witches (witches?) but I didn't see zombies on a quick read (which is when you have to see them, else they zombie all over you). Randy Kryn (talk) 13:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Probably Dronebogus (talk) 07:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Should this page be tagged for humor? 2601:647:5800:1A1F:9136:E404:D0E8:A715 (talk) 19:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Shouldn't be deleted, which is what is asked for in this discussion. Could be enlarged, at least with a humorous image if humor is intended along with the making-a-point goal of this essay. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Nom gives no valid reason for deletion. Template:essay even says it contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors, with emphasis on the one. It's policy compliant and should be kept. Central and Adams (talk) 13:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep (and expand, explain what "silver bullets" are, when it comes to deletion, give a couple examples) - Nabla (talk) 00:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.