The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ^xplicit 02:03, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Book:Foods we often eat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is my second book ive suggested be deleted, in this case for a proposed subject area that is impracticably large. This already exists at User:Djeffares/Books/The Foods We Eat, where i dont see any problem. Are there standards for what is considered an appropriate community book? Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Scope is the big problem here; another is that the subject is going to inevitably tied to a particular geographical region. I don't think there's really enough content here worth retaining: if more geographically-limited books are created along these lines, it should be trivial to repopulate them. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Improbably large scope. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:35, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.