Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no improvements, and no opposition. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 06:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the article, and found that there are several Citation needed tags in several paragraphs. As well as that, I believe there are some paragraphs that are quite messy in appearance. With those flaws, I'm starting to question the article's GA status. Railer-man (talk) 02:22, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article has the one major issue as far as I can see. the other issue present are Pages with citations lacking titles but that along with the paragraphs are cleanup work. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have counted nine "citation needed" tags and two missing title citations. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:25, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]