The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete--Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deep Blue Sea 1999 deleted shot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Niwi3 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I don't think a non-free still from a deleted scene would significantly improve the reader's understanding of the film. We rarely even use stills from official releases. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NFCC#8 and 1 (text). — Ирука¹³ 09:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Buffs (talk) 15:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 06:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cabaret OBC.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Insomniacpuppy ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Violation of WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The file does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding (WP:NFC#CS). — Ирука¹³ 09:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 06:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:BrownOnResolution.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GrahamHardy ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

As this is a 3D photo of the book, we may need permission from the photographer. The book cover itself is {{PD-US-1923-abroad}}. Stefan2 (talk) 22:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless *photo* licensing status information is provided. — Ирука¹³ 09:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Pppery (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alas and Alack poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bovineboy2008 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Tagged for transfer to Commons, but this does not appear to be an original film poster (which means it doesn't really meet the criteria for inclusion). 1916 posters were, as a rule, artwork drawn to correspond with the story as it was intended to be presented. Even photographs included in contemporary publications were rarely presented as is (waste of space to include 'dead' portions).  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 06:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kong Peng Yee.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NelsonLee20042020 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The subject is still alive so it is entirely reasonable that a free photo could be found or procured. As such, this photo appears to fail our "No free equivalent" criterion. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Since this subject was imprisoned for years and just released a few years ago, I wonder if it is realistic to expect there to be free photos to be easily found. We also have an editor who, with IP accounts and a registered account, is edit-warring to remove any photos of this subject and has blanked the file of this subject's spouse from the project so I just thought I'd add that fact here. I'm not sure if this in any way impacts this discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Great points @Liz (though I think you have pings turned off). The issue of "BLPs who are not easy to find photos of" has been pretty well Wiki-litigated. It's why we represented Kim Jong Un with this sketch until March 2017. I do appreciate the arguments that we're unlikely to find a free photograph of this man without extensive searching, however it is possible. Any Wikipedia editor could go to Singapore, find him in a park, and take a photo.

  And as for the second point- yeah, I saw that, which is why I clicked on the article and started investigating, to see if there was any rational explanation I could find for the editor's behaviour. I'm sympathetic to their concerns for the victims and their family, but that's not a justification to threaten other editors. As it turns out they might be right about the status of one image, but they went about it in a poor way. But thank you for the context, and hopefully they'll see that we do have a procedure for dealing with non-free files whose encyclopedic value or copyright status is questioned. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 02:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete If the person is no longer in prison, the image appears to be a blatant violation of WP:NFCC#1.

Furthermore, the FUR is blatantly wrong. For example, it says For visual identification of the object of the article. The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work. From what I can see, the article as a whole isn't dedicated specifically to a discussion of this photograph. Also, the image appears to violate WP:NFCC#8 in Killing of Wong Chik Yeok as these kinds of images, if non-free, normally only should be in the article about the person, not in articles about things that the person has done. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, since he was released it is possible to take a free photo of him - if someone has life in prison that is one thing, but he does not. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. I will agree with Delete per the reasons above. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 12:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, but the thing is, it might be also hard to obtain a free image. We also cannot rule out the possibility that the offender in this case may have died at this point in time, because he would have been in his seventies by now. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 12:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 06:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common Threads cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pkeets ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The file does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic (and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding). — Ирука¹³ 09:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.