The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:PatWing eleven.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Navalaviator84 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:USN Patrol Wing eleven insignia.jpeg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elvisistoast.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Susan Bartel ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photo of artwork that is most likely copyrighted. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:31, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The art work is still copyrighted, even if the photo itself is under a free license. Although an example of the artist's work to illustrate his style is appropriate, the article's current state cannot support a conversion to non-free usage. -- Whpq (talk) 13:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mona Lisa 2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Susan Bartel ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photo of artwork that is most likely copyrighted. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:31, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The art work is still copyrighted, even if the photo itself is under a free license. Although an example of the artist's work to illustrate his style is appropriate, the article's current state cannot support a conversion to non-free usage. -- Whpq (talk) 13:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:President Obama 2010.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Susan Bartel ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photo of artwork that is most likely copyrighted. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The art work is still copyrighted, even if the photo itself is under a free license. Although an example of the artist's work to illustrate his style is appropriate, the article's current state cannot support a conversion to non-free usage. -- Whpq (talk) 13:11, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teodor muzaka.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dardania0 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I cannot find the image in the cited Pinterest link or on the internet, but considering the low resolution image, missing metadata, the "Unknown" author, and as this user appears to have no regard for copyright, I think it can be assumed that the license is not true. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 16:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The claim to being the copyright holder is not at all credible given that the uploader documents this as coming from pintrest with an unknown author. -- Whpq (talk) 13:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Supplementary Vote2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Replaced with File:Supplementary_vote_two_column.svg which is not specific to one election and also does not have the quality issues this one has. User:GKFX^talk 19:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 14:40, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ways and Means1.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lampman ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Screenshot is not supported by any secondary source commentary e.g. details of the context of filming or critical analysis of the displayed characters. With only a cookie-cutter explanation given in the rationale, WP:NFCCP#8 (Contextual significance) is not met. — Bilorv (talk) 21:24, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The episode article does provide sourced information about the production and how various scenes or elements from the episode were developed. However, this particular screenshot illustrates none of those. The claim from the non-free usage rationale that the screenshot "aids commentary on the plot outline" is simply not the case as there is no commentary on this element of the plot. Merely illustrating a plot narrative without sourced critical commentary fails to meet WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 13:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.