The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:GSTC Logo Horizontal.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Roi.eco ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:GSTC Logo Horizontal.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hand in Hand project by Rotaract Club.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SHerath ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hand in Hand project by Rotaract Club.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:LeeHoi-Chuen.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Encyclopædius ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:LeeHoi-Chuen.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mapúa University Horizontal Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LipaCityPH ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Two versions of a logo are not needed for purposes of primary identification. File:Mapúa University logo.png is the main logo and this is just a horizontal version. Logos are substantially similar. Fails WP:NFCC#3a. Whpq (talk) 03:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NFCC#3a. As pointed out by Whpq above, two essentially identical logos are not needed for Wikipedia's purposes. Which one of the two is deleted probably comes down to personal preference, but both are definitely not needed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chrome Logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vanished User 0001 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep due to its use in Flat design, where its presence provides critical commentary for the article. schetm (talk) 04:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The image is used in two articles. For Google Chrome, it is not being used for identification, and the nomination covers the reason for deletion. The nomination fails to account for its use in flat design. The stated purpose of the non-free usage rationale for flat design is "Demonstration of the article's subject, by comparing different versions of the logo produced under different design principles. Because of Google's role in promoting this style of design, a visual demonstration of how they have applied it to their own products is particularly relevant to understanding it." Those are two purposes to consider. The first purpose of design illustration fails WP:NFCC#1 as the VW logos are a free equivalent. For the second purpose there is actually no commentary about Google's design or its importance there at all. As it stands, the usage fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Its use in flat design is not necessary because there's already a freely licensed series (VW) there. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep in the NY Islanders article and remove from the other at this time. Consider whether this and its supporting content should be moved to the season article as a matter of regular editing.. Izno (talk) 15:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:New York Islanders logo (1995–97).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hucz ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - the logo was infamous, and its infamy is described in the paragraph directly above the logo. To quote the nom, "the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo." schetm (talk) 04:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It must be "sourced critical commentary" and there are literally zero sources in the logo section of New York Islanders, see New York Islanders#Logo.Jonteemil (talk) 16:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would agree, but since it is now sourced, Keep. SixFourThree (talk) 16:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for the NY Islanders article and remove from the season article. I have added sourcing for the egregious disaster that was the NY Islander's fisherman logo. -- Whpq (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Item 14 of WP:NFC#UUI does allow season specific logos to be used for primary identification purposes in the main infoboxes or at the tops of articles about individual seasons. So, if the first time this was used as the team's official branding was in then 1995–96 New York Islanders season, then such the logo might be OK if moved to the main infobox. Ideally, it would be best to some sourced content about the new logo (i.e. the team's change of branding) somewhere in that article, but often this type of non-free use is considered OK even if their isn't. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 August 25. (non-admin closure) Aasim 07:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hyundai A-League logo (2004–2017).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Former MUTV logo (2).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PeeJay ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:DECORATIVE and WP:NFC#CS. No contextual connection between the article content and the image. It's just added randomly to the MUTV (Manchester United F.C.)#Presenters and pundits section and omitting it will not lead any significant loss in understanding by the reader of the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 August 25. (non-admin closure) Aasim 07:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canadiens100Anniversary.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chicago Blackhawks logo (1937-1955).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lvivske ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washington Capitals Logo 1995–2002.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewDevils.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sportskido8 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:American Airlines logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hawaiian717 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The logo is described and referred to in the section, which could be expanded if necessary. Cloudbound (talk) 18:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I have expanded the logo subsection a bit more, and adjusted the NFUR to reflect the purpose of for having this historical logo in the body of the article. The logo is the subject of sourced commentary and meets WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 00:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Badminton World Federation (logo).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Svgalbertian ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Football League.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Green Tentacle ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washington Capitals Home Logo 2002–2007.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tottenham Hotspur old logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Liandrei ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:OldDevils.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sportskido8 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celticfc100.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ShugSty ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celtic 50th Anniversary of Lisbon Lions 1967 (2017–18).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ShugSty ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washington Caps Alternate.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CelticCrest1977.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ShugSty ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewZealandFootballChampionship.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dj nix ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and also per WP:NFG. Galleries of non-free former logos like in New Zealand Football Championship#Logos are pretty much enver allowed as explained in WP:NFG and WP:NFC#cite_note-4. These gallery could've probably been WP:BOLDly removed or the individual images could've been prodded instead of immediately coming to FFD. FFD would've really only been necessary in a case like this if the file was boldly removed and then subsequently re-added or the file was prodded for deletion and then de-prodded. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:53, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aston Villa.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Arteyu ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Former MUTV logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PNG crusade bot ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:DECORATIVE and WP:NFC#CS. Pretty much the same issues as those faced above by #File:Former MUTV logo (2).png. No contextual connection between the article content and the image. It's just added randomly to the MUTV (Manchester United F.C.)#Presenters and pundits section and omitting it will not lead any significant loss in understanding by the reader of the article. One possibility for keeping this might be to convert it to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} because the Manchester United F.C. team crest (File:Manchester United FC crest.svg) is so small and blurred that it might be considered a sort of de minimis. If that's the consensus, then perhaps the file can be kept. In that case though the in article syntax would need to be clean up a bit since {{Multiple image}} would no longer be necessary. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewYorkIslandersOld.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by RickinBaltimore (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Badminton World Federation (logo).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SVTCobra ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I uploaded that image (logo) fourteen years ago when it was the active logo. I don't have a lot at stake here. I can inform everyone here, that whoever wrote the cited so-called 'policy' is out of their minds and I don't even have to be a lawyer to say that (which I am not, btw). There is no standard that one has to critique a former logo in order to use it for identification. This is beyond the pale. It is on the level of saying we should not have the 48-star US flag on Wikipedia because there are now 50 stars and the old one can't possibly be used unless you condemn the addition of Alaska and Hawaii. This is incredibly stupid. I really don't care much about the logo, but the logic being used here is insane and must be stopped before it destroys Wikipedia as a whole. --SVTCobra 02:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SVTCobra: Flags, unlike logos, are often public domain and thus not goverened by copyright.Jonteemil (talk) 05:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I know. And therefore it was perhaps not the best example. But my point is, there's no "critique" requirement in fair-use law. Critique is merely one of the things that could make use pass the the fair-use test. But educational and informational identification is a much stronger component of the relevant code. --SVTCobra 10:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While I understand what you're saying, Wikipedia's non-free content use policy was set up to be more restrictive than fair use per WP:NFC#Background and WP:ITSFAIRUSE and it's been that way almost since the when the policy was established. If Wikipedia's policy was equivalent to fair use (at least the US's concept of fair use), non-free images of any type could pretty much be used in any article. When the policy was first being developed it was decided that was not a good thing; however, whether that is something that makes more sense now per WP:CCC is perhaps something worth discussing, but that discussion probably needs to take place at WT:NFCC or WP:VPP since it cannot be resolved here.

As for this particular logo, the long-standing consensus when it comes to non-free former logo use is pretty much as stated in WP:NFC#cite_note-4. Generally, WP:NFG doesn't really allow non-free images to be used in an image gallery because such use tend to be primarily WP:DECORATIVE as opposed to contextual and non-free former logos which are simply moved to body of the article once they are replaced in the main infobox tend to have problems per WP:NFCC#8. In Badminton World Federation#Logo there is some content about the BWF's change in branding over the years, but whether that requires that the two non-free files actually be seen for that content to be understood seems IMO to not be the case per not only NFCC#8, but also WP:FREER (WP:NFCC#1). So, if there's anything more (i.e. sourced commentary) that can be added about the BWF's change in branding that perhaps explains the reasons why it changed logos or why these former logos were selected, then that might strengthen the case for each former logo's non-free use. It has to be something better than simple statements which simply describe the logos or state that they were just changed at some point in time. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• This is being used in a gallery. It's got a single sentence of sourced commentary, which states no more than that it was replaced in 2007. The non-free use rationale is merely the boilerplate template, and claims that the purpose of this image, which has not been used by the organization for thirteen years, is identification. Fails WP:NFCC#8 by a wide margin. Delete. —Cryptic 23:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:National Lacrosse League (logo).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ottawasenatorsjerseys.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Earl Andrew ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tampa Bay Lightning.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kalel2007 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 September 7. Wikiacc (¶) 04:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miami Dolphins wordmark 1997-2012.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:TampaBayLightningAlternate.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faxe Kondi Ligaen.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kalaha ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: In addition to the issues cited above by the nominator, there's also a problem with WP:NFG in Danish Superliga#History. Non-free image galleries are almost never allowed and mixing non-free images together with files from Commons doesn't make it OK. The simple fact that the only sentence related to this logo is "After a single season under that name, Faxe Brewery became sponsors and the league changed its name to Faxe Kondi Ligaen." is not sufficient to justify using this file per WP:FREER or WP:NFC#CS. The only possible way to keep this that I can see would be if this can be converted to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} since it might be OK per c:COM:TOO United States even if it's too complex per c:COM:TOO Netherlands. The logo is bascially a combination of simple elements and text except for the soccer ball; however, soccer balls seem to be fairly c:COM:CB#Utility objects and c:COM:UA per c:Category:Association football balls so the ball imagery itself might not be considered complex enough to be eligible for copyright protection under US copyright law. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Angeles Kings Logo 1967-1982.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aston Villa FC logo (2000-2007).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Malpass93 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eintracht Frankfurt historial.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wiggy! ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 August 25. (non-admin closure) Aasim 07:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minnesota Wild Alternate.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Angeles Kings.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kalel2007 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 August 25. (non-admin closure) Aasim 07:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:5th Anniversary.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minnesota Wild alternate logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kalel2007 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 August 25. (non-admin closure) Aasim 07:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:BBC Two Paint ident.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:LosAngelesKings1988.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016–18 Malaysian FA Cup Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Minz48 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oakland Seals Logo 1967–1970.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:TBL Logo-Old.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Angeles Kings Alternate Logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:LosAngelesKings1982.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fuzzy510 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASB-Premiership.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dj nix ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and also per WP:NFG. Galleries of non-free former logos like in New Zealand Football Championship#Logos are pretty much enver allowed as explained in WP:NFG and WP:NFC#cite_note-4. These gallery could've probably been WP:BOLDly removed or the individual images could've been prodded instead of immediately coming to FFD. FFD would've really only been necessary in a case like this if the file was boldly removed and then subsequently re-added or the file was prodded for deletion and then de-prodded. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:53, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 August 25. (non-admin closure) Aasim 07:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minnesota@vikings.50th anniversarylogo.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Channel 5 1997 ident, Variant I.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Peppa Pig the Second ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 August 25. (non-admin closure) Aasim 07:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MontrealCanadiens1918.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and relicense to {{PD-logo}}. Wikiacc (¶) 02:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oneworld 10 Years Anniversary.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ZZeBaH Punk ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO, convert to {{PD-logo}} and move to Commons. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 October 2. Izno (talk) 15:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:HSV Hamburg.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:OHSAA 100 Anniversary logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stepshep ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and also because of WP:NFCC#3a and WP:FREER. This is essentially identical to File:Ohio High School Athletic Association logo.png being used in the main infobox with the only real difference btween the two being that the anniversay logo has e banner stating "100 years". Morover, not only is there no sourced crtical commentary about the logo itself in Ohio High School Athletic Association#History, there's no content at all about the organization's 100th year anniversay. This is total WP:DECORATIVE non-free use that completely fails WP:NFC#CS. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nashville Predators Alternate Logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Sourced critical commentary about the image is present in the article. Stifle (talk) 08:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nordiques proposed - accurate colours.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Libertyernie2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - this one fits the exception to the ban on historical logos. SixFourThree (talk) 16:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep "described in the context of critical commentary about that historical logo". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mega 1075 old.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mbrstooge ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO. Convert to {{PD-logo}} and move to Commons. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:FöreningsSparbanken (logo).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Camptown ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ott sens campaign.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ottawa sens logo old.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and relicense to {{PD-logo}}. Wikiacc (¶) 00:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bridgefm 2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wacky WeLsH LaD ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO. Convert to {{PD-logo}} and move to Commons. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Columbus Blue Jackets Logo 2000 - 2007.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nordiques proposed logo - correct colours.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Libertyernie2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - this one fits the exception to the ban on historical logos. SixFourThree (talk) 16:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep "described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 October 2. Izno (talk) 15:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGM Ident 1956-57.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo md earlier.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kille ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep as below the threshold of originality. Wikiacc (¶) 00:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bridgefm 1.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wacky WeLsH LaD ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO. Convert to {{PD-logo}} and move to Commons. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swansea City AFC logo (100th anniversary).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Malpass93 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 September 7. Wikiacc (¶) 04:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MSV Duisburg historical.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep in the specific year article, remove from other. Izno (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NZL Premiership (2016–17).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheBigJagielka ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove from New Zealand Football Championship per nom and also per WP:NFG. Galleries of non-free former logos like in New Zealand Football Championship#Logos are pretty much enver allowed as explained in WP:NFG and WP:NFC#cite_note-4. These gallery could've probably been WP:BOLDly removed or the individual images could've been prodded instead of immediately coming to FFD. FFD would've really only been necessary in a case like this if the file was boldly removed and then subsequently re-added or the file was prodded for deletion and then de-prodded.
  Keep in 2016–17 New Zealand Football Championship per items 14 and 17 of WP:NFC#UUI.
  While it's true the non-free use in the main article about the NZ Football Championship is not WP:NFCC compliant, the non-free use in the individual season article is not the same and is actually be used for primary identification purposes. Common practice over the years has been that non-free use of season specific articles tend to be OK for article about individual seasons when they are used for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infoboxes of such articles. Of course it would be a good thing to have sourced article content about the logo somewhere in the season article, but not having such content is generally been OK for the reasons given in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 for cover art used in a similar manner. Multiple uses of the same non-free file are not automatically always equivalent. The nom isn't clear whether he believes all uses of the file aren't NFCC compliant, but it's important not to automatically treat them as such. Non-free files with multiple uses don't necessarily need to be deleted just because one or more of their uses aren't NFCC compliant; they only need to be deleted when all of their uses aren't NFCC compliant. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, should certainly be removed from New Zealand Football Championship; it's in a gallery with two other former logos, with zero sourced commentary or even a mention in the image's NFUR. I'll be renominating the other two for deletion once I finish cleaning up after the botched mass-restoration from Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 September 5.
  The use in the season article is borderline. I could be convinced to keep it there despite the lack of sourced commentary, but the boilerplate NFUR rationale is inadequate. —Cryptic 01:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Comoros FA.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:PHXold.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGM Ident 1938.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LBM ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The logo itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary in the article Leo the Lion (MGM), in the section "Tanner (1934–1956)", which discusses the specific lion that appeared in this logo.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep "described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGM Ident 1928.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LBM ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The logo itself is the subject of sourced discussion in the article Leo the Lion (MGM), in the section "Jackie (1928–1956)", which discusses the specific lion that appeared in this logo.--Tdl1060 (talk) 00:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per NFCC 8 and 3a. Coverage is trivial for any one lion, and there's no need for a large number of substantially similar non-free images. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep "described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo". NFCC 3a is met, as the discussion of this particular lion requires the display of it. Ditto for NFCC 8. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calgary Flames horse head logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:StLouisBlues1967.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MPKB-BRI U-BES F.C. 2017 Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JebatMalaya ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Izno (talk) 15:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CDVictoria.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep but move to main infobox. This is described as a "former" logo in C.D. Victoria#Old logo and that type of non-free use certainly isn't WP:NFCC compliant as explained by the nom. However, there is no current logo being used in the main infobox which is something that nom probably didn't notice or didn't really consider if they did notice it. All of the club's official social media accounts that I could find (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram) still seem to be using this logo. It has a slightly different background, but the primary logo still seems unchanged. So, it should still be OK for this to be used in the main infobox for Wikipedia's purposes.
  If you look at the article's history, you will find that c:File:CD Victoria.png and File:CD Victoria (Honduras).png were once being used in the main infobox. The first one was deleted from Commons by Jcb as copyvio, while the other was deleted from Wikipedia by Fastily per WP:F5. Not much can be done about the Commons file, but the one Fastily deleted can probably WP:REFUNDed if it's significantly different from the file being discussed here. If, however, it's not really all that different, then it might just make more sense to simply move this one to the main infobox instead. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:28, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seattle Reign FC crest (primary), 2013.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mightytotems ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whalers 10th Anniversary Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 September 7. Wikiacc (¶) 04:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:AirAsiaAllstarsFCLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewEnglandWhalers.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fuzzy510 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Izno (talk) 18:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aer Arann Express logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benstown ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: actually this logo looks like it should be {{PD-textlogo}} and transferred to the commons. ww2censor (talk) 11:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and relicense to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}, under TOO in US, but copyright status in source country is unclear (see c:COM:TOO Ireland). Wikiacc (¶) 02:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO. Irish TOO is unclear, but Commons precedent suggests that it is probably acceptable. Convert to {{PD-logo}} and move to Commons. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Wikiacc. Likely copyrighted in Ireland, but not in the USA. Same principle as File:Aer Arann logo (blue).svg. Stifle (talk) 14:27, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liga Malaysia Logo 2004.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JebatMalaya ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 September 7. Wikiacc (¶) 04:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mega 1075 new.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Djibouti FA.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:S-Cards map.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jamesmiko ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Izno (talk) 18:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angels50.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CASportsFan ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO. Convert to {{PD-logo}} and move to Commons. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: While I'm in agreement that this probably falls below c:COM:TOO United States and thus can be relicensed as "PD-logo", I would still argue that it can be kept even if as non-free content per items 14 and 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. Although this is a aniversary logo, it is being used for primary identification purposes in a stand-alone article about the particular season where it was used by the team. It would be better if there was some discussion of this choice for the anniversary logo somewhere in the season article, but generally season specific logos have been allowed to be used in main infoboxes of season articles per items 14 and 17 of NFC#UUI. This type of non-free use tends to be treated more like the way cover art is treated in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 when it comes to WP:NFCC#8 when used for primary identification purposes of a season article than it would be treated per WP:NFC#cite_note-4 if it was simply a former logo added to the body of the main Wikipedia article about the team itself. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The logo contains complex elements and layout, and is copyrighted. As an article about the team's season, it does not need a logo for readers to be able to understand it. Stifle (talk) 08:37, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Izno (talk) 18:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mgm-roast beef and movies.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Superfine ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The logo itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary in the article Leo the Lion (MGM), in the section "Telly (1928–1932) and Coffee (1932–1935)", which discusses the specific lion (Coffee) that appeared in this logo.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per NFCC 8 and 3a. Coverage is trivial for any one lion, and there's no need for a large number of substantially similar non-free images. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep "described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo". NFCC 3a is met, as the discussion of this particular lion requires the display of it. Ditto for NFCC 8. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, somewhat reluctantly, but the article has sourced critical commentary about each image and the omission of one or more images would be detrimental to understanding of the article. Stifle (talk) 14:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liga Futsal Kebangsaan 2017 Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JebatMalaya ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liga Malaysia Logo 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JebatMalaya ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MPKB-BRI U-BES F.C. Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JebatMalaya ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:StLouisBlues1990s.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fuzzy510 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:1075TheOasis2003.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mbrstooge ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO. Convert to {{PD-logo}} and move to Commons. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CFN-CNBC logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:UEFA Euro 1976 logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BaldBoris ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 September 7. Wikiacc (¶) 04:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liga Malaysia Logo pre2004.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:FC Yerevan Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Velo01 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:UEFA Euro 1980 logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BaldBoris ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:1075TheOasis1992.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mbrstooge ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Stifle (talk) 08:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGM logo used in the movie "2001 A Space Odyssey".jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wa2ise ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:NFCC#8, as there is discussion about this particular lion located directly to the left of this image in the article. Loosing the image would "be detrimental to (the) understanding" of the evolution of the lion. schetm (talk) 03:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The logo itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary in the article Leo the Lion (MGM), in the section "Leo (1957–present)", which discusses this "Stylized Lion" logo designed by Lippincott.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above as there is commentary. -DJSasso (talk) 12:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep "described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo". NFCC 3a is met, as the discussion of this particular lion requires the display of it. Ditto for NFCC 8. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 September 7. Wikiacc (¶) 04:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olympia Alzey.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CBBC 1997 Man and Dog.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cloudbound ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I'd say that considering "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." it does help to increase the reader's understanding and is referred to within the accompanying text. Cloudbound (talk) 23:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No sourced critical commentary related specifically to this indent can be found in CBBC idents#Yellow animations. Basically, the only content about this indent is a single entry in an embedded list of about twenty other indents that states "Man and Dog - A man walks his fluffy dog on a lead. The dog, however, gets caught on a rock and unravels into a single line, much to the owner's bemusement." Nothing about that meets WP:FREER, WP:NFC#CS or even WP:NFLISTS, and removing the file wouldn't be detrimental to the reader's understanding of the relevant section in any way per WP:DECORATIVE. Moreover, there are no images being provided for any of the other indents referred to in that section or even for any of the other entries in the embedded lists found in other sections of the article, which makes any claim that seeing this particular ident is more significant to the reader's understanding than seeing images for any of those other entries quite suspect. The only possible way I could see to resolve this would be to move this file to the top of the article and try to argue that it's a representative image for all the idents mentioned throughout the article; that, however, is a really iffy argument at best and I don't think a consensus could be established for it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coca-Cola Ligaen 1995.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Froztbyte ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep as below the threshold of originality. Wikiacc (¶) 00:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bridge FM.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Koman90 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO. Convert to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:J3 League (Horizontal).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fetx2002 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO. Convert to {{PD-logo}} and move to Commons. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winnipeg Jets Inaugural Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jmj713 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Discovery Networks EMEA.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Väsk ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:West-Bromwich-Albion-F.C.-old-logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bigaofuganda2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 September 7. Wikiacc (¶) 04:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CocaColaAmatilBrand.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and relicense to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. Wikiacc (¶) 00:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Former Uni-link (Minerva Accord) logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Unisouth ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. Seriously, did the nom even look at it? schetm (talk) 03:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Just want to point out that c:COM:TOO UK is quite low, however I don't think this logo is above the TOO anyway.Jonteemil (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep but relicense to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. As Jonteemil rightly points out above, the TOO for the UK is significantly different from that of the US and {{PD-logo}} requires that the logo be PD in both the US and its country of origin. So, even though it might be argued that this logo is still protected in the UK, it seems clearly below c:COM:TOO United States. Often in such cases, common practice has been to treat the file as PD locally for use only on English Wikipedia and I think that can at the very least be done here. If the consensus is that it’s PD also in the UK, it can be relicensed as “PD-logo” and tagged for a move to Commons per WP:MTC. This probably didn’t need to be discussed at FFD; the license could’ve been WP:BOLDly changed or it could’ve been fairly quickly resolved by asking about it at WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC.
  Finally, File:UniLinkLogo.svg, the file that seems to have superseded this one, is probably also OK as “PD-ineligible-USOnly”. The only potential problem there has to do with WP:NFC#Multiple restrictions. If being an svg is a concern then a png version of the logo should be fine. — Marchjuly (talk) 22:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below US TOO. Convert to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:3. Liga logo (2017).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by S.A. Julio ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Izno (talk) 18:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:J2 League (Horizontal).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fetx2002 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Bascially this closes and the closes of #File:J.League Division 2.png and #File:J3 League (Horizontal).png need to be the same; if one of the three files is too simple to be non-free content, they all need to be too simple because they are essentially the same logo. The only possible copyirghtable element is the "J" with the two circles, but that seems to clearly be below c:COM:TOO United States. So, the only question then is whether this should be {{PD-logo}} or {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} and that depends on how you interpret c:COM:TOO Japan. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vegas Golden Knights secondary logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Toohool ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2013 Malaysian President's Cup Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by OnlyGCX ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Izno (talk) 18:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tampabaydevilrays10thanniversarypatch.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TrueCRaysball ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't know about this one, but am leaning towards Keep. It is being used as the primary means of visual identification in the Infobox, which has long been allowed. I do think that if we're going to start restricting Infoboxes, we should have that conversation over there to involve the maximum amount of input. SixFourThree (talk) 16:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per items 14 and 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. Although this is a aniversary logo, it is being used for primary identification purposes in a stand-alone article about the particular season where it was used by the team. It would be better if there was some discussion of this choice for the anniversary logo somewhere in the season article, but generally season specific logos have been allowed to be used in main infoboxes of season articles per items 14 and 17 of NFC#UUI. This type of non-free use tends to be treated more like the way cover art is treated in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 when it comes to WP:NFCC#8 when used for primary identification purposes of a season article than it would be treated per WP:NFC#cite_note-4 if it was simply a former logo added to the body of the main Wikipedia article about the team itself. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minnesota North Stars Logo 1967-1974.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO. Convert to {{PD-logo}} and move to Commons. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ermiszonianafc.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dante77782 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Izno (talk) 18:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banistmo logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as below TOO, at least in the US. Convert to {{PD-logo}} or {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}, depending on country of origin. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]