The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georg Philipp Telemann Portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Voceditenore ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Available under superior quality at File:Telemann2.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. Voceditenore (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Kelapstick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:07, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:YachtReliance.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jnc ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

already available on Wikimedia Commons . signed:Donan Raven (talk) 14:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grawe's Consistency Theory Model.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by April Fain ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails NFCC#1 - charts can almost always be recreated from the original data Keri (talk) 15:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vine app signup page.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atownballer ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I see no reason that explaining that the user can sign in using email or Twitter cannot be conveyed by text alone. kelapstick^(bainuu) 19:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:An Example of The Kinetic Depth Effect.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zuchinni one ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

non-free image that could be replaced by a user-created and freely licensed image. Fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 23:45, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Action Park's Wave Pool Under Rennovation.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Travelsonic ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

non-free image used to simply show some earthmoving/construction work. Does not add significantly to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 23:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Mayhap I should have added more context in the description of the photo to justify the use in the article. When Action Park, and the rest of the Vernon Valley-Great Gorge resort - was taken over by Intrawest, one goal they had was to make the park safer, and to shake off the image that had been created over the past 20 years. The photo in dispute here shows renovations being conducted on what was arguably one of Action Park's most lawless, and dangerous attractions, the Tidal Wave Pool. 100 people rescued the day the wave pool opened in 1983, according to Andrew Mulvihill, son of Action Park founder Eugene Mulvihill, several drownings, strong rip currents that, combined with the high, and powerful waves, even put lifeguards at risk, just to name a few aspects that contributed to its infamy. After these renovations, the wave pool would be shallower, and the wave generation system changed to a system that would not create the huge waves, rip currents, and would have a decent cooldown time between wave generation periods. Given that, I feel this photo provides more than a view that "simply show(s) some earthmoving/construction work," but instead helps to illustrate the radical transformations that went on with the Action Park property after Intrawest took over in 1998.Travelsonic (talk) 13:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Although this image does illustrate the subject of extensive nature of the the wavepool's reconstruction, it's so complete a reconstruction that the image is not really recognizeable as the wavepool, nor are the operations we can see being performed obviously relevant to its safety (the key reason for it being done). "Looks like just some construction site". None of the original dangerous aspects are visible. Simply stating in text that it was "nearly completely replaced", or "substantially overhauled", would probably suffice. Of encyclopediac value would be a "before" image if it emphasized any of the dangerous details, or before+after side-by-side to illustrate very clearly the nature of the changes. DMacks (talk) 17:07, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- I'm not sure I'm following you on the recognizability due to the extensive nature of the reconstruction bit, and the relevance or lack thereof in the photo, but then again, maybe I am just derping from my usual sleep deprivation. I mean, it seems what the ride would later look like ultimately would be irrelevant, I mean here you see elements from both wave pool versions (though that assumes there weren't more transitional versions in between the 1998 - 1999/2000 period) - the waterfall facade from the redesigned pool, the building at the end with the Action Park logo (the building of which would merely be renovated, versus torn down completely, if I recall correctly) - but please, guide me where I may be missing what you are saying.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Travelsonic (talk • contribs) 22:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.