The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colombia.CesarGaviria.01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hjr ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:26, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Korean-vowels.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Nohat ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:26, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ppf small.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mydogategodshat ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Would be redundant to file:Île-de-France-Position.png I think. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carte Localisation Région France Ile-de-France.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snoyes ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons' Perfectly reasonable map, compatible license, contains department information that is missing from the locator map used on the article, seems very useful. 76.66.192.73 (talk) 05:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete, again duplicated (99%) on Commons. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carte Localisation Région France Midi-Pyrénée.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snoyes ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons' Perfectly reasonable map, compatible license, contains department information that is missing from the locator map used on the article, seems very useful. 76.66.192.73 (talk) 05:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete, as previous. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:51, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carte Localisation Région France Pays-de-la-loire.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snoyes ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons' Perfectly reasonable map, compatible license, contains department information that is missing from the locator map used on the article, seems very useful. 76.66.192.73 (talk) 05:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete, as previous. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:51, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carte Localisation Région France Provence-Alpe-Côte-d'Azur.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snoyes ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons' Perfectly reasonable map, compatible license, contains department information that is missing from the locator map used on the article, seems very useful. 76.66.192.73 (talk) 05:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ^Avicenna_sis @ 00:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:LouiseMecklenburg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Infrogmation ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I was the uploader back in 2003. This is a remenent of the early days of Wikipedia before we had the "thumbnail" feature and had to upload images at the same resolution as would be used in article. Now redundant with higher res of same on Commons at File:Louise-mecklenburg-strelitz.jpg -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete performed by Athaenara (talk) at 23:58, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Japanese-vowels.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Nohat ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serotoninbiosynthesis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Fuelbottle ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:29, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:VictoriaParkLeicester.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Morwen ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:29, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:OAS.Logo&HQ.01.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hjr ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, unencyclopedic. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Locmap arnhem.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Patrick ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, source image deleted at de.wikipedia for having no license, see de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/Archiv:Lösch-Logbuch/20041118 (search for "Bild:Karte gelderland arnheim.jpg"). --The Evil IP address (talk) 18:47, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pattadakal2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by KRS ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Somnathpur2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by KRS ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Watts Towers 241x323.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rfc1394 ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oliver Cowdery photograph, c. 1848.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by COGDEN ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• No objection. The photo is historically valuable, but we are currently using a much better photograph than this one. COGDEN 18:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons. This is a photo of Oliver Cowdery. Even if this image is not used here on the English Wikipedia, it may be useful in another project. —Bkell (talk) 19:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep/move What Bkell said. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pottersig1899.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Caltrop ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Moved to Commons and deleted; nominated nine months ago, and it could have been moved then since it's clearly {{pd-us}}. This need not have been brought here. Rodhullandemu 23:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:French1899.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Caltrop ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Commons. This is a photograph of Daniel Chester French. —Bkell (talk) 19:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and what Bkell said. A photo from 1899 (as long as it was published) can be labeled {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} or {{PD-US-1923}} as necessary. Commons would be the place for it if it isn't copyrighted in its home country. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag zh.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kokiri ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. Superseded by File:Flag_of_Canton_of_Zürich.svg. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yuanze.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Patrick0Moran ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChihuahuanDesertPlants.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ancheta Wis ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, unencyclopedic. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is certainly not "unencyclopedic"—if it were of a higher resolution it could be a very useful picture. Unfortunately this image is of such low resolution that I don't think it can be salvaged. —Bkell (talk) 19:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which is precisely why I nominated it as "Unencyclopedic" -FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 23:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, to me "unencyclopedic" means "not appropriate for an encyclopedia" and refers to the subject matter of the image, not the image quality. The kinds of images I would call "unencyclopedic," in general, are things like personal photos of college students in bars, user-created "logos" for themselves, blatant political propaganda or commercial advertising, self-created abstract art uploaded by non-notable artists, etc. A photograph of typical plants in the Chihuahuan Desert is not unencyclopedic—in fact, we have several such images in the Chihuahuan Desert article. —Bkell (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ontario Legislature.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Trontonian ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Commons. This is a photograph of the Ontario Legislature building—how is there "no foreseeable use"? —Bkell (talk) 18:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It is a copyrighted photo and cannot be moved to commons (copyright/credit is claimed on the photo itself). — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmm, looks like you're right. I didn't see that the copyright notice in the image credits someone other than the uploader. —Bkell (talk) 16:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay, upon further thought, I still !vote to move to Commons. The copyright notice in the image says "© Coolth 2003 Used with permission." The uploader, User:Trontonian, is apparently named John FitzGerald (see Trontonian's user page), and he claims to have taken the picture himself, so I think we can safely assume good faith and conclude that "Coolth" is another handle he has used in the past. Anyway, the existence of a copyright notice is certainly not detrimental to moving the image to the Commons. The Commons accepts freely licensed images as well as those that are not copyrighted (i.e., in the public domain). —Bkell (talk) 17:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons with explanation of pseudonyms. Reasoning:
  1. "Coolth" is directly associated with a "John Fitzgerald" on the Internet; if one searches for Coolth "John FitzGerald" on Google, there are citations to John FitzGerald via www.coolth.com as a source: see, for example, [1]. The coolth.com domain seems to be squatted on by Network Solutions itself now, but some (spammy) caches on Google show it registered to John Fitzgerald in Toronto previously. I'd say it's very safe to assume that "Coolth" = User:John FitzGerald, and User:John FitzGerald is definitely User:Trontonian.
  2. The only thing that seems odd about this photo is that the pattern on the sky in the upper left is usually an artifact of being scanned from a screen-printed publication rather than a direct photograph. However, considering this was scanned in January 2004, it could just be the scanner just wasn't up to the par we've expected more recently, and some later resizing enhanced a standing-wave vibration in the scanner.
  3. This user eventually had 7000+ edits under his 4 usernames (Jfitzg, Trontonian, TronTonian, and John FitzGerald), so I'd definitely take the summary at its good-faith face value: "taken by and belonging to Trontonian. The file was created in 2004 but the original photograph is circa 1980." And, since he had 1300+ edits as Jfitzg by the time he uploaded this file as Trontonian on 2004-01-09, I think it's safe to assume that he was familiar with the Wikipedia terms for his own works by the time he uploaded it, even though someone else added the {{GFDL}} tag explicitly on 2004-01-09. (If I'm wrong about that, please speak up!)

As a result of all that: GFDL-licensed work uploaded by the creator whose own copyright is on the image. --Closeapple (talk) 09:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks for all the research. Good job! —Bkell (talk) 10:37, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dime con quien andas.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pilaf ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:El mal escribano.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pilaf ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:En boca cerrada.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pilaf ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:No hables de la soga.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pilaf ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:No hay mal.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pilaf ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:No por mucho madrugar.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pilaf ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pájaro en mano.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pilaf ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Si quieres el perro.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pilaf ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polygonum0772.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pollinator ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frederick Temple.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Craigy144 ( | contribs | uploads).

• Superseded by File:Frederick Temple Vanity Fair 6 November 1869.jpg on Commons Rcbutcher (talk) 05:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Charles Ryle.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Craigy144 ( | contribs | uploads).

• corrupt version (laterally inverted) version of original (http://www.darvillsrareprints.com/Images/images/Vanity%20Fair/Clergy/ryle.jpg). Now Superseded by correct version File:John Charles Ryle Vanity Fair 26 March 1881.jpg on Commons Rcbutcher (talk) 07:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lord Charles Brudenell-Bruce.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Craigy144 ( | contribs | uploads).

• image is a corrupt version of original (laterally inverted & signature clipped off) : see original at http://www.darvillsrareprints.com/Images/images/Vanity%20Fair/Royalty/bruce.jpg . Now superseded by accurate version File:Charles Brudenell-Bruce Vanity Fair 16 September 1882.jpg on Commons. Rcbutcher (talk) 09:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ASAP. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bullseye1972.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Wikider ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned image from recently-deleted article. Sottolacqua (talk) 12:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open plamed point.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Riff Johnson ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphan. There is a duplicate at File:Sam Newman Open-Palmed Point.jpg, which is being used, but this version is not. Cnilep (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The duplicate is no longer being used, either. It's also likely that this image is non-free; note what appears to be a TV broadcaster's logo in the lower right corner. Cnilep (talk) 15:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both this and File:Sam Newman Open-Palmed Point.jpg: Clearly a television screenshot, from NBN Television in New South Wales, very likely of a Nine Network program between 1994 and the present. Australian works are copyright in both Australia and United States from moment of creation. According to Australian copyright law#Ownership of copyright (unsourced in article!), Australia does not require a copyright notice. --Closeapple (talk) 08:11, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cotoia mark.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Cotoia ( | contribs | uploads).

• Unused promotional photo. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 16:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. —Bkell (talk) 18:58, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dukespirit1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:#File:Dukespirit1.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs | uploads).

• image is out of date, member has since left, image is detrimental to band Bigdukeboy (talk) 16:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CPFreak 06-07-07086.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by CPFreak ( | contribs | uploads).

• Unused. Apparently shows "Water Bombs", but the image is so washed out I can't see anything in it. —Bkell (talk) 18:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RPBEGGS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Typetive ( | contribs | uploads).

• I created this image (http://www.flickr.com/photos/typetive/110369849/meta/) but the source of the image was listed as the Hershey Corporation when it was first uploaded. It is not a marketing or promotional image - it was originally used by me as editorial content. The product (Reese's Peanut Butter Eggs) is available on the open market and is not unique, a substitute image could be supplied that does not redistribute my original content. Typetive (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.