• Comments

I have the following concerns:

• Prose/MoS:

1. and five video albums > and five [[Home video|video albums]] While there add in tally and link for music videos.
   1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
2. number one UK dance hit > number-one UK dance hit
   1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
3. Clarify: "the release of "Who Do You Love Now?",". This seems to imply a solo hit by Minogue, there's no indication here that its by Riva or that it also peaked at number one on the same chart.
   1. Done. Added a note. — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
4. Verify by reliable source(s):
   1. "achieved thirteen consecutive number one dance singles, becoming the best performing artist" The closest the source, which is pretty weak for this claim, gets is "confirming Dannii's title as 'Queen of the Clubs', having reached pole position 13 times since 1997 - a feat no other female artist even comes close to". Nothing about consecutive, leaves possibility of a male artist or a band achieving more 'pole positions'. Furthermore, the Singles table in the FLC contradicts the claim: there are only 12 number-ones by Minogue, a 13th number-one is by Riva featuring Minogue; and the 12 are interrupted by two non-number-one singles, so they are not consecutive.
   2. Done. I removed the word "consecutive" and added a note that one was with Riva. — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      1. Fix number one > number-one. Hint: for adjective e.g. number-one hit, for noun e.g. peaked at number one (the latter also has a hard space).
   3. "her first number one UK dance hit", "As of March 2013, she has sold over seven million albums worldwide". The profiletalent.com.au article is written by Melissa LeGear (not acknowledged), who is Minogue's talent manager and consequently not reliable for these facts.
   4. I have removed the album sales claim because I cannot find another source. — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

5. Add |+ List of studio albums, with selected chart positions and certifications to second line of relevant wikitables, but adjust 'studio albums' to suit.
   1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
6. Adjust Hung ref:cite web|url=http://australian-charts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Dannii+Minogue|title=Discography Dannii Minogue|publisher=australian-charts.com. Hung Medien|accessdate=19 March 2013 > cite web|url=http://australian-charts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Dannii+Minogue|title=Discography Dannii Minogue|publisher=Australian Charts Portal. Hung Medien (Steffen Hung)|last=Hung|first=Steffen|accessdate=19 March 2013 Adjust similar refs in this style.
   1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
7. For ref[6]. Add authorlink to David Kent (historian) While there check usage: only up to 1992; e.g. Girl (1997) at No. 69, not verifiable by either source. You'll need his later book at ref[30] for most of her 50+ singles/albums.
   1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
8. For ref[15], and other similar. MoS album title.
   1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      1. You've missed a few. e.g. ref[17]: title should be Love and Kisses by Dannii Minogue not Love and Kisses by Dannii Minogueshaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:35, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
9. For ref[20], and similar. MoS program title.
   1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
10. Fix ref[22], url currently ends with .pdfe should be just .pdf Also add: format, archivedate, date, and publisher's acronym i.e. (ARIA).
    1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

11. UK Dance Chart refs: except ref[32], you need better sources for charting. Ref[3] is a record label, ref[31] is a tabloid, neither is reliable for such claims.
    1. Done. I have used the book written by Minogue and Terry Ronald to verify chart positions. I only own the kindle version (so no page numbers, but it's noted) — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
       1. My Story is an autobiography co-written with a long-term session musician/business associate and can be used for various details of her personal life, however it is hardly unbiased or reliable for charting information. You need a better source for all those number-ones. Does the Music Week source provide further information? (see here) If you use a number of these at Highbeam consider using a ref cluster to group them.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
12. Format refs[36],[37], single titles are not italicised. Alternately: the two could be combined into one if citing the album rather than its tracks.
    1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
13. Wikilink Young Talent Time in Other appearances.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
14. A couple of (ARIA) for refs[33],[35]
    1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
15. Other appearances section now has a note claiming they're guest appearances, some of them are but some are not, fix this.
    1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
16. Page no. for ref[40]?
    1. Changed the ref. This was added by another user and I can verify it — Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
17. Above the infobox, add templates: {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2013}} {{Use Australian English|date=April 2013}}
    1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
18. At ref[2], add authorlink for each author; wikilink Kindle edition by pipe to Amazon Kindle and use template's edition= parameter, viz: {{Cite book| last = Minogue | first = Dannii | authorlink = Dannii Minogue | first2 = Terry| last2 = Ronald | authorlink2 = Terry Ronald | title = [[My Story (Dannii Minogue book)|My Story]] | year = 2010 | publisher = [[Simon & Schuster]] | edition=[[Amazon Kindle|Kindle]]| isbn = 978-0-85720-052-5}}
    1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
19. Ref[41], MoS title, including Of > of
    1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
20. Ref[55], full last name; add & wikilink publisher.
    1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:35, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

21. Check ref tab order: some are no longer numerically correct.
    1. Done — Underneath-it-All (talk) 04:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:01, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Stability: handling possible edit wars

1. Consider article history from about 2 to 30 March 2013, here: it shows considerable reversion of edits by anonymous IPs, a single purpose account, and others. Does this constitute edit warring? Consider the FLC criterion: "content does not change significantly from day to day". I support the attitude and activity of the nominator (and some other helpful editors) in ensuring that the content is appropriately verified by reliable sources and MoS standard is maintained. The article was correctly semi-protected on 5 March (to 19 March) but by 22 March another round of deletions/reversions started. All this disruptive activity may well be in response to the FLC process. I believe that greater communication on the article's talkpage – not just adding a comment to the reverting editors' pages or in edit summaries – about the issues would also help. This should have occurred from earliest opportunity, certainly by the time of 4 March when large blocks were being deleted and reverted. It can still be done as a historical reference. It shows your rationale to other editors, provides a record of the activity by disruptor(s) in a more visible place and should provide wider collegiate support for your efforts.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
   1. Thank you so much for all your comments. They have definitely made the discography much better and reliable :) – Underneath-it-All (talk) 04:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• There are still two outstanding comments: Nos. 8 (check all refs for MoS titles of albums or singles) and 11 (still not happy with My Story as ref for Charting).shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I have removed the UK Dance Charts because I cannot find reliable sources. They can always be re added at a later date. Also, all done Nos. 8 – Underneath-it-All (talk) 20:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Stability: possible edit wars?

1. Consider article history, since about 2 March 2013, here: it shows considerable reversion of edits by anonymous IPs, a single purpose account, and others. Does this constitute edit warring? I support the attitude and activity of the nominator in ensuring content is appropriately verified by reliable sources and MoS is maintained. However I believe that greater communication on the article's talkpage (not just any disruptive editors' talkpages or in edit summaries) about the issues would also help.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]