The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 20:59, 20 March 2007.

The article is very well written. Very intresting, and of a very notable worldwide football club. Retiono Virginian 17:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Previous nomination here. Oldelpaso 19:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose too many sections, bold text, poor layouting, single sentence sections, poor inline referencing, list material. Some more pictures would be helpful too. =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Nichalp. Gran² 20:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose needs lots of work such as embedded references for a start. Get it to "Good Article" first.--The Negotiator 21:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose a bit better than the article when it had its first FAC four months ago, but most of the same reasons still apply, particularly too recentist, not well-cited enough, staccato prose and too much listcruft. Qwghlm 00:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Lack of proper referencing, too many lists and lack of pictures (I would have thought that a picture of a recent game from a spectator would be in there for sure!) Harryboyles 04:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Still not up to scratch (and I'm meant to be helping improve it). Darkson - BANG! 09:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.