Wikipedia:Editor review/Bidwell House
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Bidwell house (talk · contribs · count) I am relatively new and I would like help on writing in an encyclopedic style Bidwell house (talk) 18:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Reviews
- Review by JUJUTACULAR | TALK
- On Notability: Sometimes, the subject of an article is simply not notable. If there isn't significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject (as required by WP:N), there shouldn't be an article on it. I understand the frustration in seeing an article that you put time into be deleted, and I admire your resolve to keep working on Wikipedia. Your contributions are appreciated and hope you keep on keepin' on.
- On the article, Henry Knox Trail: It looks like you've made a decent start to a valuable article. There are a couple of issues you can work on. It seems all of the references are to this site. While it looks like a good source, additional sources would help to validate the article. As it stands, it could be tagged with {{onesource}}. Another fix you could make is to consolidate the multiple instances of the same source into one reference. This can be done by writing <ref name="XXX"> at the start of the reference, instead of just <ref>. Then, when you want to cite that source again, you can simply type <ref name="XXX"> (without having to copy all of the source info).
- Again, thank you for your contributions, and happy editing! JUJUTACULAR | TALK 03:00, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- Colonial and Berkshire County History related articles; starting the Henry Knox Trail article 1
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I have been involved in notability disputes; I tried to improve the article but it remained "unnotable"
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.