Varidesk (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

Article was deleted without an AFD nor a speedy deletion request, and can be redirected with history to Gemmy_Industries#Sister_company. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• endorse deletion there's no requirement to delete something through AFD or prod, and the G11 was valid. Praxidicae (talk) 17:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Endorse deletion was a clear G11, so I'm not sure why nom thinks there was no speedy deletion request (admin only). There is nothing to be restored. G11, G12 and COI (although not of course a reason for deletion in itself) all applied. StarM 18:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I was the deleting admin, and a new redirect as created by Jax 0677 seems appropriate. Otherwise, I'm not sure why this unsourced blatant spam, with some obvious UPEs, has been brought here, especially as I've explained to Jax 0677 here why it was basically crap Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment just dropping link to parallel conversation at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Varidesk where Jax also raised the question. StarM 20:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Endorse Not sure what you're talking about here, it was tagged as G11 by Jmertel23. Regardless, an admin may delete things without needing someone else to tag it. Plus, looking at the deleted version, it was garbage. Just straight promotion, and looks like a copyvio to me. Turning it into a redirect but removing the history has been done and is the right answer. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Endorse deletion - even if it hadn't been tagged for CSD admins are allowed to clean up blatant spam, copyvio, etc. without notice. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Endorse blatant advertisement. DGG ( talk ) 09:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Endorse, entirely reasonable deletion decision. Stifle (talk) 11:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Endorse - Not sure what the issue was, but it looks like a valid deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]