Total_Miner – Endorse. Subject does not yet have the required sources for a stand-alone article. Opinion seems to be that if better sources appear in the future, just go ahead and recreate this (or ask for the deleted text to be userfied as a starting point) and if people still don't like it, they can take it to WP:AfD. – -- RoySmith(talk)20:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
The game was recently released on Steam, has an active following and is in constant development. It is one of the best selling XBLIG of all time, just like FortressCraft and Castle Miner. Both of those games still have their own articles, and are equally notable to Total Miner. The article should be reinstated and not a redirect to Minecraft. 86.150.18.203 (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Metacritic is saying no critic reviews as of yet, google news saying no news. Based upon that an endorse is the only appropriate outcome for this DRV - it doesn't look notable now it has been released let alone two months before release. If the article is recreated we can just look at any refs and notability at that time in an AFD. The article history can be offered for a userpage now if there is an interested editor, I can't see much happening with this unless it grows substantially but sandbox games occasionally do. Szzuk (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've temp undeleted the talk page. If what User:Ss112 says there is true, then this shouldn't point at 6ix9ine either, nor should that article mention this. Either way, I would've sent this to WP:RFD instead of speedying it. —Cryptic15:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jax, a random person on the Internet trying to make a name for themselves called "DJ Get It Rite" compiled a "mixtape" on DatPiff with "Gummo" on it. It's not from 6ix9ine at all. No other reliable search results show up for it aside from more uploads of this fanmade compilation. If it were official, there'd be something. Ss11215:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
The page was deleted for being created by a banned user evading their ban however the page was not created by a user banned at the time of the articles creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank Schneider1972 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
X
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung
