Endorse the !votes can be summarised thus: 2 Keep, 4 Merge, 2 Keep/Merge, 1 Delete/Merge. It's a little difficult, reading through, to grasp what level some !votes were suitably justified - they all have arguments, but some are not explained/supported. In any case, I would say that in the event of a K/M or D/M, and no indication they would specify if given further time (2 weeks in 2 cases), it is reasonable to say those saying so have had sufficient time and discussion. If so, then a lack of specification can reasonably be taken to be accepting of either option. That said, the !vote numbers condense to 4 Keep:7 Merge. Now I don't know if that was then further affected by argument weight, but it seems a reasonable consensus was demonstrated. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:59, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse close – Over the discussion, a consensus has developed to merge. Closer made a correct assessment of the arguments. As OP, I also support the merge. — JFGtalk04:23, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]