What do you want to happen, exactly? It would be perverse to close as no consensus on the grounds that there was no agreement about the target of the redirect, as there was very clear agreement to redirect the article. I suggest you retarget the redirect or send it to RfD if you want it to point to a different target. Hut 8.520:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is the wrong venue for this discussion. The AfD was clearly going to redirect this somewhere, it's just a matter of which of the two plausible targets it was going to be. Either be WP:BOLD and change the redirect to point to what you think is the better target, or start a conversation on the article talk page about changing the redirect, or ping the closer directly and ask if they would mind changing it. None of those require DRV involvement. -- RoySmith(talk)20:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reply - I asked CAPTAIN RAJU how he chose the target, but he did not respond. I therefore took the issue to WP:DRV. The discussion should have been relisted in order to determine the preferred target. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy endorse no need for a DRV: switch the redirect to whatever you want per BOLD. Raju probably went off the nose count, as there weren't strong arguments for one over the other. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. I was the only participant in the AfD who recommended a redirect but not to the target selected by the closer. And I'm fine with the selected redirect target now. --Metropolitan90(talk)13:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
