As the closing admin noted himself, the closure was a partisan action. The member should have simply commented like everyone else. Reopen the discussion (overturn speedy keep) and allow the MFD to reach a normal conclusion. — V = I * R (talk to Ω) 01:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse as closure. The closure was purely pragmatic. Everyone except the nominator and a banned sockpuppet was !voting for a speedy keep. If I hadn't done it, someone else would have done it by now. Sceptre(talk)01:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You know, if this had occurred tomorrow I probably wouldn't have bothered objecting, let alone bringing this here. Considering the fact that the discussion was open for less then an hour I don't know how you can assert that "everyone was !voting speedy keep" (and mentioning the sock is a bit underhanded; I certainly didn't precipitate the participation of a disruptive sockpuppet into this). Aside from all of that, you really should have allowed someone else to do it anyway. — V = I * R (talk to Ω) 02:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how that can be justified, considering that the discussion wasn't even given a chance to occur (either on the project page, or the MFD). Oh well. The best way to deal with trolls is to ignore them anyway. I'm just going to ignore the whole thing. I can at least say that I tried to help. *shrug* — V = I * R (talk to Ω) 03:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
