The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| yak _ 19:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zenith Staybrite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:33, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:11, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:55, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The firm appear as one of "four major companies" in the UK double-glazing industry criticised in a Which? report in 2010: [1]. And earlier, there is this BBC report on the impact on workers of the previous firm going into administration. AllyD (talk) 09:11, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• This firm appears to be several layers down in corporate structures: taken over in 2008 by Weatherseal (no article) and now part of My House Group (no article). AllyD (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Insufficient evidence that the company/brand is notable in its own right. AllyD (talk) 10:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No standalone notability. I'd go for a redirect but there's no article for the parent company. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps Weatherseal needs to be created so that this article can be moreged into to it. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:32, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.