Zemun Stadium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable soccer stadium that fails both WP:GNG and WP:NARENA, which holds that athletic stadia are neither presumptively notable nor inherit the notability of any teams that play there. Significant coverage has not been demonstrated to exist, the article has been inadequately sourced for over fifteen years now (and was notability tagged for 12 years), its only current source is primary. Previous AfD went keep on the basis of several "It's notable," "It's big," and "Important games have been played there," among other illegitimate reasons. Ravenswing 09:43, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete zero notability established. Sole source is from the home club, their website also doesn't appear to exist anymore. Looking at the previous AfD (which you also nominated), all of the keep arguments completely violated WP:INHERIT and WP:NARENA (which some of them even used as a keep argument), and the closing admin looks to have simply done a vote count. Aydoh8^[contribs] 10:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Serbia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:39, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to either Zemun#Sport or FK Zemun if no coverage is found. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:47, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That would run afoul of WP:XY. Ravenswing 04:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  To fix WP:XY, I would say redirect to Zemun#Sport if no coverage is found because the topic is broader than FK Zemun. --Habst (talk) 15:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  No objection. Ravenswing 18:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I would be absolutely astounded if this isn't notable. I'll try to do a source search in a bit. SportingFlyer T·C 19:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per previous AFD which contains numerous sources. GiantSnowman 20:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Which of those sources do you claim provides SIGCOV to the subject? (Never mind that the editor who found those sources went on to state that none of those sources satisfied the GNG) Ravenswing 05:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the sources at the previous AfD demonstrate notability, along with [1] [2] and books such as Srbija: znamenitosti i lepote (1965) SportingFlyer T·C 21:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The other issue is this stadium is known by several different names, making BEFORE searches more difficult. Recent coverage also includes [3] [4] SportingFlyer T·C 02:12, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Adding the sources identified here or in the previous AfD to the article would likely help garner consensus quicker.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 04:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: None of the sources provided in this AfD or in the article contain the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. I'm not finding anything else that would suggest notability, and notability is not inherited. Let'srun (talk) 21:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The article has significant potential for expansion and it is notable. — Sadko (words are wind) 16:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]