The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube and the Hood Prank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Firstly, its an essay. Secondly. "Youtube, Race and the Hood Prank" is not a subject supported by any references including this one and the others that are cited. Article Fails WP:BASIC. Note, also at Draft:Youtube and the Hood Prank Flat Out (talk) 05:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agreed. Basically WP:OR. South Nashua (talk) 15:42, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Long, long WP:ESSAY that doesn't belong here. Nate • (chatter) 06:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It is an Essay, and original research. 68.233.214.74 (talk) 19:12, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this is an essay, not an encyclopedia article. Lepricavark (talk) 02:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.