The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲_水 11:16, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

XOR (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability WP:CORP, Advertisement. Slowthin (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Slowthin:, have you gone through the references? I am assuming you have checked WP:BEFORE and not hounding me and nominating it just because I tagged your article for CSD which resulted in deletion of the article. --KartikeyaS (talk) 06:38, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a clear case of advertisement of a company which is not notable to have its entry on Wikipedia for now.Slowthin (talk) 09:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Every source I checked in the article is PR bluff, including the VentureBeat article, which is a press release republished elsewhere. Forbes Sites references are always misleading, it is a self-published platform used by marketing agencies and not under Forbes editorial policy. --MarioGom (talk) 10:06, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why not vote delete then? --Adamant1 (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adamant1: Because I did not search for reliable sources elsewhere. I wanted to note that sources currently used in the article are not enough, but that alone is not reason for deletion. --MarioGom (talk) 00:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. That makes sense. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Struggling to find many references to XOR that aren't either a mention in passing or a reprint of a press release. -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 21:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Nothing useful comes up in a Google search and all the sources in the article are either primary, trivial mentions, or about venture capitalist funding. That said, I wag my finger at the original nominator if the reason for the nomination was hounding another user. Although, at least it led to something useful. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.