The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William H. Nation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SOLDIER. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 03:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 03:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 03:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 03:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 05:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Seems like there are many such articles - the soldier has ABC award, article is written. BlueD954 (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No evidence of significant coverage in WP:RS per WP:GNG. —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.