Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West End AFC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. No delete !votes apart from mine, and the sources added to the article demonstrate WP:GNG is likely met. (non-admin closure) SportingFlyer T·C 12:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

West End AFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A PROD was removed in 2017 since the club technically has played in the New Zealand cup. Coverage I found included a local league write up [1] and another local write up featuring their reserve team [2] but both are WP:ROUTINE and so the article fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 16:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 16:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 16:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, but the discussions going on over at WP:NSPORT continue to demonstrate that articles can/should be deleted if WP:GNG isn't met. New Zealand isn't a country where sources would be unavailable, either - they might exist, I might have missed them, but I certainly can't find them. SportingFlyer T·C 18:24, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • NSPORT specifically says Some sports have specific criteria. Otherwise, teams and clubs are expected to demonstrate notability by the general notability guideline. WP:FOOTYN says Per Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Teams, teams are required to meet the general notability guideline. The following guidance may indicate at what level teams generally have enough coverage to meet the GNG. Therefore, a "general guideline" just means "likely meets GNG," but I don't think this particular team does meet the GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 18:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It is just a matter of knowing where to find the sources, I have done a bit of a decent update of the page around their Chatham Cup history using a couple of Football Project reliable sources in RSSSF and the Ultimate NZ Soccer website. There will probably be more Stuff write-ups as well. I have added some already, as well as from the Otago Daily Times.NZFC(talk)(cont) 06:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: Found all the following that can be added into the article as well. I will try and read through and add what I can at a later point from the below.NZFC(talk)(cont) 09:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the Otago Daily times ones are more passing mentions but carry result information
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.