Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webutation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 13:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Webutation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced neologism that was previously deleted. ALI nom nom 14:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Change the spelling to "weputation" and we-diwect to Elmer Fudd. Although it was noticed by a couple of news sources in 2007 [1], it never really caught on. Even on the web, there are relatively few hits [2] and none at all in books [3]. Mandsford (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Article was prodded and deleted in 2007 and reappeared. I removed the PROD tag under procedural grounds alone. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 15:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, that's what I figured, but when you didn't tag it for another form of deletion, I wasn't sure. Thought this might be the best place to take it. ALI nom nom 15:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think the articel sums it up. Its a made up word in need of deltification.Slatersteven (talk) 15:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NFT. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Obvious neologism (and in the web world, things such as this are rarely obvious). ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 15:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete A7. Also a neologism. --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 20:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.