The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 02:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Violet Apisah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extensive junior career but does not meet WP:NTENNIS. Runner up in junior grand slam is close but not enough. LibStar (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Tennis, Oceania, and Australia. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: She meets the guidelines of Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines#Player as she has competed in Fed Cup competition before. Keroks (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's still an essay. Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Tennis is considered the notability standard which does not include Fed Cup. LibStar (talk) 01:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are many many tennis player articles which are based of their participation in Fed Cup / Davis Cup competition. If you delete this one, I also suggest you go through many of the other thousand articles and delete those too for consistency. Keroks (talk) 12:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to do this soon when I have the time. Many of these Fed/Davis Cup-only players have no possibility for any reasonable expansion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:GNG. BilledMammal (talk) 01:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes Wikiproject Tennis Guideline. Has participated in a major international tournament for her nation in Fed Cup. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, the essay at Wikiproject Tennis cannot be used to support keeping an article that fails WP:GNG. BilledMammal (talk) 09:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep New sources added since nomination satisfy WP:GNG, with the Sydney Morning Herald and The National articles all SIGCOV. Jevansen (talk) 04:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Jevansen, I think the article now passes WP:GNG. WP:NTENNIS appears to be in flux. Bonoahx (talk) 00:19, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY. Cabrils (talk) 02:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.