Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vickie Powell
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Vickie Powell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable per WP:PORNBIO, no assertion of notability, no awards won, no significant coverage online in WP:Reliable sources, though subject has abundant mentions in unreliable sources. Gurt Posh (talk) 07:36, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Gurt Posh (talk) 07:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO. Also fails GNG without significant coverage by reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable person. Keb25 (talk) 11:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Whatever coverage is out there seems to be limited to the trivial and the promotional. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:52, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - Google and Yahoo didn't show any biographical sources aside from the pornography videos links. SwisterTwister talk 19:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As a porn model, she has done nothing outstanding relative to her counterparts.Curb Chain (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.