The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Turbomasters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't establish notability. TTN (talk) 19:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 19:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Transformers (toy line). This group of toys has no independent notability, nor does it have reliable sources discussing them. They are mentioned in the main article on Transformers toys, so a redirect there seems appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.183.45.226 (talk) 19:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I get the impression that no one cares, and I am not convinced that Wikipedia would be better off if this article was kept... Josh Milburn (talk) 22:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.