The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tricia Psarreas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Only published work appears to be a self-published book. Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Hirolovesswords (talk) 08:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree. Likeanechointheforest (talk) 18:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Search of my university library database (includes ProQuest, JSTOR, etc.) and Google News revealed nothing to demonstrate sigcov. Book lacks reviews/coverage and so could not meet that criteria of WP:AUTHOR. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG Samsmachado (talk) 19:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. It looks to me as if there could be an undeclared COI problem here. The only three edits by Spongebob2323 were on creating this article.--Ipigott (talk) 11:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Can confirm search is failing. kinda like how the article is only AfDed after six years since the PROD ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 06:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:SIGCOV. Indepedent publishers are not automatically notable, unless they have had significant coverage or are otherwise notable. I found a few mentions of the subject on Twitter regarding a story on EEEL from 2015, but other than that, there's nothing reliable. A Google newspaper search find zero hits about this person. Bearian (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Google search turned up no reliable independent sources that discuss the subject or the works significantly. --Ashleyyoursmile! 08:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.