The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. It may ultimately make sense to redirect or merge, but we have a rough consensus is to keep for the time being. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To Set It Right (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod declined. No sourcing found, only unrelated material with "to set it right" and "the lieutenant" in it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I found mentions here, here, and a review here. It's not a slam dunk on notability, but it's enough for me to err on the side of keep. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:14, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The article does need improvement, but is not likely to get that if it is deleted. I plan to follow up on the links noted by NinjaRobotPirate and add to the article. Rick Norwood (talk) 12:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:08, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to The Lieutenant. I was unable to find much more than brief mentions in Star Trek books. The DVD Talk review is a start, but I wouldn't say it's very substantial. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 14:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per RS identified above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to The Lieutenant. The coverage in independent sources just mentions this episode, and all that one can possibly say about the topic can fit into a small to medium article section. There's no reason to keep a separate article to hold this material. --Slashme (talk) 23:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.