The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:58, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tinpahar (tinpahar.com) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CSD tag removed by IP editor. AGF that this is not the creating editor logged out, so AfD s the place to bring it. This is a non notable corporation and an advert. Fiddle Faddle 16:26, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No independent sources = no notability. --Randykitty (talk) 17:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 October 24. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 17:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Mea culpa. Twinkle said it had happened and I trust Twinkle. Fiddle Faddle

• Delete No WP:RS evidence of attained notability for this website launched just weeks ago. Fails WP:NWEB; at best WP:TOOSOON. AllyD (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—No coverage in reliable sources. Non-notable. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 19:48, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:00, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:00, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:00, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete this website just started a month back, noted has some credible people mentioned as contributing content for this website, we have to wait for this website to really become what they think it will be and then it will deserve a page, wiki is not a advertisement forum, you have to arrive first not use wiki to arrive, my two cents.--Nlfestival (talk) 21:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete- The website was been function for more than a year now. NOT "a month" old. It seems that the website has credible people as contributors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayo Swaaq (talk • contribs) 14:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC) — Mayo Swaaq (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Please see WP:NOTINHERITED. --Randykitty (talk) 14:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.