The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Redshaw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Routine coverage here doesn't pass WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 22:16, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Cambodia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Routine coverage of a diplomatic career. Nothing substantial to establish notability. JohnmgKing (talk) 15:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.