The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:26, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking in C++ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's a lot of books out there about computer programming, and I don't see why this one is significant. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:05, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete apparently fails book notability guideline. Would suggest merging into author, but there isn't much to merge. --NYKevin @238, i.e. 04:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BOOK Wikipedia:NBOOK; everything which is in the article, is already on author page, so there isn't anything to merge. Ipsign (talk) 06:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Ipsing meant to link to Wikipedia:Notability (books) D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:21, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • My bad, thanks, I've fixed it above. Ipsign (talk) 04:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I also nominated the authors for deletion; Eckel and Allison D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• delete exceptionally good book for the price but not especially notable.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 20:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.