The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-28 07:40Z

The ryston shield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non notable school football competition. No sources. Prod removed by author. OnoremDil 10:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages:

The Linford cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - added at 10:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Longwood football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - added at 10:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom Stephenb (Talk) 10:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC) (All three Stephenb (Talk) 07:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)}[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Neigel von Teighen 10:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update: Delete The Linford cup too. --Neigel von Teighen 10:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 10:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both non-notable 5-a-side tournaments organised for the pupils within a single school, no different to the 5-a-side leagues run at sports centres up and down the country. No reliable sources ChrisTheDude 11:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • ....and also delete the non-notable team which I didn't notice was also bundled in :-) ChrisTheDude 11:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all as highly non-notable, unknown outside the school the players attend. Qwghlm 11:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all - about as non-notable as you can get. - fchd 11:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete - the names don't lead to articles about the footballers, just historical people who happen to have the same names. This is a 'pet vanity project'. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 12:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• That goes for all three. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 23:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Extranet ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 12:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all three, as non notable.♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 14:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the lot - so where are these "biggest talents in recent memory" who've apparently emerged from it, then? Those bluelinks are all false positives, unless the current holders really did have the governor of Iowa as centre-forward, the youngest American to climb Everest on the left wing and a 17th century pirate in goal - iridescenti (talk to me!) 18:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Mr Stephen 13:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.