The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Gun Club (secret society) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

all the links are dead, except one, which mentions this club in passing, and, as evidently, something made up one day by a small group of people, which never took off. even supreme court justices occasionally do nonnotable things. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:ORG. There is not much depth of coverage of this organization; apparently, the society has been too secret to get written about enough to justify an article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - very low coverage. Mkdw^talk 20:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Barely verified, non-notable. Almost by definition, a "secret society" is non-notable. It can't be both secret and notable. (The article even admits "little is known about the secret group.") --MelanieN (talk) 18:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.