The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 22:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terry's_Old_Geezers/Gals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD)

completely without merit. Joke article. All relevant content is already in Terry Wogan. Nssdfdsfds 11:48, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, anything relevant already exists in the Wogan article; this article is heaped in WP:OR and possible WP:BOLLOCKS. The Rambling Man 15:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom -- Whpq 18:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, although if not already present, a redirect from Terry's Old Geezers and Terry's Old Gals to Terry Wogan should be in place. It's just possible that people might hear the phrase and not have listened to the Wogan show. Sam Blacketer 23:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think he ever uses the terms. He often says 'togs', but never the expanded form. The togs redirect is ok.Nssdfdsfds 09:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.