The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural Close. Malformed AFD. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 20:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tantive IV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DELETE. Non-notable. It's mostly a collection of in-universe trivia written by fan-boys. This stuff has a place, the Star Wars Wiki. This kind of popular culture content, especially something so deeply in-universe, is simply non-notable and trivia.Mundilfari (talk) 03:53, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• You placed a {{Prod}} template rather than AfD template. Regardless: Keep. The article contains plenty of out-of-universe material establishing third-party marketing and offers a real-world perspective on the topic's development, with minimal (and appropriate) plot summary. Perhaps an appropriate merge subject, but not anything requiring deletion. --EEMIV (talk) 03:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy procedural close there was never an AfD. 76.66.197.30 (talk) 03:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.