The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subhuman (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film Theroadislong (talk) 10:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 10:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no references, fails all notability criteria Fiddle Faddle 11:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As mentioned by Tim. It's like any film to me. Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 11:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As always, we do not just indiscriminately accept every film as "inherently" notable just because it exists — we look for markers of its significance. According to IMDb it won Best Film at a non-notable minor film festival — but that's not a "notable because award" clincher in and of itself, because what we're looking for on that score is notable awards (Oscars, CSAs, the major elite tier of film festivals like TIFF and Berlin and Cannes and Sundance) that get media coverage, and not just any film award that exists — and for critical attention, all I can find is one WordPress blog which is so unreliable that the last time somebody tried to use it as a source for Wikipedia content they tagged National Film Board of Canada documentaries and the Canadian film classic Goin' Down the Road as B-movies. There are sources out there that can be used to show "notability because critical attention" for a horror film, but Canuxploitation is not one of them, and I literally can't find any better quality sources to salvage this with at all. Bearcat (talk) 13:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.