The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Stone butch. (non-admin closure) buidhe 07:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stone femme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Uncited slang term. For over 5 years the only citation was an online forum, and that was removed a year ago as not a reliable source. ZimZalaBim ^talk 01:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - this is an important LGBT term with several reliable references, including reliable essays and journals on sexuality and gender identity. A very very quick Google found references at Medium, several journals on gender identity, this book, and this book. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:38, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Stone butch. This is an unsourced DICDEF, most definitions of which revolve around the phenomenon of stone butch. (Cardiffbear, even some of your linked sources acknowledge this.) I think we would be better off improving the stone butch article with this sort of scholarly information about the partners of stone butches, than keeping this article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Stone butch and subsequently redirect there. Worth at least mentioning in that article - although I think Roscelese actually meant merge rather than plain redirect too, from the comment they've accompanied their !vote with. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 13:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep/merge. Notable identity, likely passes GNG; merge is acceptable course for now until someone does the work to improve article. This was never a good AfD candidate. Gleeanon409 (talk) 08:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.