The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that the subject of the article does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines at this time. Mz7 (talk) 10:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Uribe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Opening this for User:Central2017 who claims "I am the article subject, and I regard myself as a non-notable, private person, and I want this page to be deleted" but does not understand how to complete a proper AFD. I have explained that this is not a sufficient reason for deletion, and given OTRS contact info for proving her identity. Having said that, I'm nominating this for deletion as failing WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. The article is almost unsourced, with nothing but a dead link to the subject's own website and a pic and passing mention in the click bait "The 50 Hottest Columbian Women". She apparently hosted The Sonia Uribe Files but that seems to have been very short lived. All I can find is one episode from 2008. I have not found the significant coverage in independent reliable sources to justify an article on this woman. Meters (talk) 04:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Barely even mentions exist of her. Galobtter (talk) 06:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is nothing recent about her in many years. — Juan1973 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 09:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC).[reply]

• See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sonia Uribe Files. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. I was wondering why having lived in Colombia for many years I had never heard of Ms Uribe, and then I noticed that she was only born there and is now a resident of my home city. Without wishing to be rude to Ms Uribe, I have to agree with her assertion that she isn't notable. Her TV career seems to have consisted of one documentary which wasn't shown on any major TV channel. That documentary was filmed by Colin Cobb, who is the head of Presenter Promotions, and it appears that Ms Uribe was on the company's books for a while, as she made a showreel for them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMo3nifI_Es. However, for whatever reason her presenting career hasn't advanced since then, and it seems now that she has retired from the spotlight, so it's unlikely that we will see anything more than her sole documentary. Richard3120 (talk) 23:00, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Richard couldn't have said it any better. Delete this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juan1973 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC) — Duplicate vote: Juan1973 (talk • contribs) has already cast a vote above.[reply]
• So we do have an OTRS? Because based on above it seems that WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE would apply in this case. Delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Shawn in Montreal: I provided the OTRS contact information, but I have no access to see if the user has contacted OTRS (and based on the lack of familiarity with Wikipedia I suspect that there has been and will be no formal request). Since the article is more than 11 years old I thought it was worth taking to AFD to make sure I wasn't missing something. It looks like everyone is in agreement though. Meters (talk) 07:15, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: She's virtually non-existent. What is Wiki waiting for? Delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PiaM (talk • contribs) 02:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC) — PiaM (talk · contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• @PiaM: please be patient, even an unopposed deletion discussion like this can remain open for as many as 7 days. There's also no need to create duplicate accounts and !vote here, that is referred to as WP:SOCKPUPPETRY and is prohibited. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I've very seldom !voted to delete by the subjects request, unless there is a good case that the presence of the article is unfair. But this is simply a case where there is no reason to have an article , and it wouldn't matter who suggested that we remove it. DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.