The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:27, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saville (1778 ship) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence found of any notability, same databases, primary sources and passing mentions as in previous AfDs for similar articles. Fram (talk) 08:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Transportation, and United Kingdom. Fram (talk) 08:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to the set index Saville (ship) as an alternative to deletion. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 09:10, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • It would be better to turn that set index into a redirect to the one remaining article, instead of having a short list of two unremarkable ships and one perhaps notable one (not clear if that last one would actually survive AfD either). Fram (talk) 09:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or at worst merge, adding references to the target. Nevertheless, I am extremely dubious as to whehter any of the ships listed there is individually notable and thus whether that article should not also be subject to AFD. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:GNG. Even if more documentation on the ship exists, there is nothing to indicate it is any more notable than any of the other whaling vessels of the era. Chagropango (talk) 08:10, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete clear GNG fail. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.