The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| spout _ 20:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sathish Kumar Sivalingam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking ghits and Gnews of substance to support article. References are his own web page and fan page. Reads like a resume and lacks reliable references. Appears to fail WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 15:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• delete a nonnotable functionary. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This was tagged for db-g12 (spam), but it's not blatant spam. Nyttend (talk) 18:14, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Lacks reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.Nishadhi (talk) 17:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.