The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no significant coverage in reliable sources. very brief flirtation with the very edge of fame, not enough to justify a page here/pass GNG Rayman60 (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Can't find RSes to show notability, otherwise it fails BIO overall. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 16:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete won a beauty pageant at a non-notable level, and nothing else is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.