The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:52, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sack of Kathmandu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cited by a dubious WP:NEWSORG i. e. Online Khabar. The other outlet (Nepali Times) is not vetted by any scholar and the event is itself loosely covered in few lines, fails WP:MILNG. Garuda ^Talk! 01:16, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Hinduism, Bangladesh, Nepal, India, and West Bengal. Garuda ^Talk! 01:16, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: A lot of here and there yet no separate section for "Sack" and "invasion". Everything about the event revolves around background and aftermaths. "His army sacked the temple of Swayambhunath and looted Kathmandu city for three days, returning to Bengal with plentiful spoils." is the only relevant info to be found which doesn't pass WP:SIGCOV. Mr.Hanes Talk 16:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nomination. - Ratnahastin (talk) 16:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.