The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close‎. Original AfD has now been reopened. See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2025_January_6#STONEX_India. Owen× ☎ 14:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

STONEX India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meeting NCORP; relisting again after delreview BoraVoro (talk) 08:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Delhi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural close due to an ongoing deletion review for this topic. I appreciate BoraVoro acknowledging their close of the previous AFD was incorrect. However it is not appropriate to have an AFD and DRV running simultaneously. Based on the current state of that DRV (consensus to relist appears to be forming), it would be best to close this AFD and relist the already-started discussion so users can directly respond to the points brought up there. Frank Anchor 14:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.