Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SGML name
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to SGML. (non-admin closure) — Yash [talk] 04:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- SGML name (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is an orphan, and contains no context or mention of why an SGML name is notable or what it's used for; has no context other than the name's syntax. Quinxorin (talk) 06:50, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to SGML—A name is a thing in SGML, but I can't imagine why we'd want a separate article on it. I suppose we would if names were things that people wrote articles about, etc, and had significant coverage on their own. I don't know of such coverage. We already have SGML, where names are discussed. HaugenErik (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to SGML: As HaugenErik says, this is not a concept of its own; it is meaningless outside the context of SGML. -- BenTels (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect I'm hesitant to even think a redirect is necessary in this case considering the nature of the topic even. A merge might be suitable. The content would need to be merged to warrant a redirect. Mkdwtalk 02:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to SGML#Syntax. -—Kvng 04:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.